Tag - blogging

Calacanis: most bloggers suck

Update: see Jason Calacanis’ comment below. He was misquoted or quoted out of context, and does not believe that non-top-ranked bloggers suck. At least not automatically. (Check his comment!)

Quick question: are you in the Technorati Top 100? If not, I hate to break the news, but you suck. If it makes you feel any better, I suck too.

Why?

Well, according to Jason Calacanis’ recent keynote at Blog Business Summit, if you don’t rank high on Technorati, you suck. Simple.

”Blogging is the biggest meritocracy in the world. It’s not broken. You don’t rank? It’s because you suck. … How well you do is up to you.”

However, there is a simple way to not suck:

He said all you have to do is look at the top stories on TechMeme, say something intelligent about the story, link to the other five top bloggers talking about it, and do that for 30 days straight, then you’ll be an A-list blogger.

Do most bloggers suck?
Obviously, most bloggers are not in the Technorati 100. Some us can’t even get Technorati to index our blogs regularly (see the last updated “4 days ago” nonsense).

Do we suck?

No! Some of us talk about things that are not mainstream. Some of us just haven’t gotten the break that pushes us out of the millions and into the thousands. And most of us just don’t want to do something as silly as blogging reflexively about the top three stories on Techmeme, day after day after day.

That said, I have to be careful here. I haven’t heard the keynote myself, and am just going on what other bloggers are publishing about it.

One more caveat: it sounds like he’s saying the way to be popular is to …

  1. write well
  2. write often
  3. write on topics other people care about
  4. and comment intelligently on other people’s blogs

Fundamentally, I have no disagreement with that at all. That’s all true – as far as it goes. I don’t think doing that guarantees that you’ll hit the Technorati Top 100, but it’s all good advice and IS going to get you higher ranking, more traffic.

What I disagree with is saying that bloggers who don’t rate high suck.

. . .
. . .

Update 10:24 PM:
This post just hit the home page of Techmeme. Also available here.

[tags] calacanis, technorati, ranking, blog business summit, keynote, sucking, john koetsier [/tags]

Technorati not indexing blogs properly: blogosphere in shock

I’m almost in shock: Technorati admitted on their blog that they sometimes don’t index sites properly:

The good people at Strumpette contacted us [… ] told us that we hadn’t been processing updates from their blog for a few months, even though they’d complained about it. We looked into this more closely, and it turned out they were quite right.

This is the first time I’ve ever seen an admission from Technorati that they have issues spidering. Kevin Marks explained the problem:

If the feed is not full content, we correlate posts between the feed and the HTML of the main page, to see if there is more there (many sites have brief summary feeds, and full posts on the main page; some have the opposite).

However, until yesterday, this code had a problem with sites that appear with and without ‘www’ in front of them. For example Strumpette’s permalinks start with ‘http://www.strumpette.com’ in the feed, but we were indexing the HTML from ‘http://strumpette.com’, seeing relative permalinks from the page, and missing the correlation between the two. This bug is now fixed, and we handle this case better, so Strumpette and others will see better indexing of their posts.

Why, then does Technorati processing seem so random? This blog has had periods of a week to two weeks where Technorati stops indexing, and then spontaneously starts up again. In fact, many people have had similar experiences. Just read some of the comments on these posts:

Time and again, after I post on Technorati, pinging, searching, and problems, bloggers come forward and say: yup, that’s happened to me to. Frequently, it’s still happening to them. And it’s happening right now on this blog.

I publish full feeds, and WordPress supports both Atom and RSS – Kevin mentioned in his post that Atom was best. Here’s what I’d like to ask Kevin Marks (or anyone at Technorati):

Why are there always problems with Technorati’s pinging?

. . .
. . .

Posts discussing these issues:

[tags] technorati, problems, ping, kevin marks, strumpette, john koetsier [/tags]

Post with pix (or, how to make your blog more popular)

Somewhere, I forget where, I read that blogs that have pictures for each post are more popular. Since I know I read it on the internet, and everything on the internet is true, that’s precisely what I’m trying.

(I think it just makes everything look better, to be honest. It’s just a little easier on the eyes.)

So I’ve been looking for places to get appropriate photos. Unless you have hundreds of thousands of photos, you probably don’t have enough for every possible blog post. And, even though I have over 10,000 photos in my iPhoto library, do you think they’re nicely tagged, sorted, keyworded, and therefore searchable? Think again.

I checked out stock.xchng, which is cheap. Some photos are free, others cost one or more credits, which you can buy. However, the photo library does not have a photo for every possible need, and I have a constitutional aversion to paying for things when I don’t have to.

Instead, I’m using Flickr.

Nothing compares to the tagging and indexing that dedicated Flickr members (including myself) tag their photos. Which is wonderful, since things are easy to find.

Such as Santa Claus. Or military ship. Or iceberg.

Most people, including myself, put their photos up on Flickr entirely or mostly free of restrictions. So it’s easy, free, and high quality. Flickr hosts the photos, and I, in turn, link to them.

Which makes a great bargain.

[tags] photos, blogging, flickr, john koetsier [/tags]

Vancouver Enterprise Forum tonight

science-world-vancouver.jpgIf you’re in the Vancouver area, kick on over to that big silver geodesic dome across from False Creek (yup, this one) for Vancouver Enterprise Forum.

Should be great … the topic is Enterprise 2.0: How Business Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Web.

You’ll hear from international technology expert and writer Dr. Paul Kedrosky on what Enterprise 2.0 is and means for your current or future business, and also from executives of three innovative new B.C. companies focusing their energies on making the web work for business. Our feature entrepreneurs include Anthony Sukow of Victoria’s Terapeak, a young firm that analyzes the emerging masses of data generated by web activity to improve decision-making and profitability. Dr. Kedrosky will also be joined by Andrew Catton of DabbleDB, a firm that has created an easy-to-use, high-quality hosted product for online storage, sharing and manipulation of enterprise data. As an online provider, DabbleDB represents the next generation of enterprise software. Our third business speaker is John Lyotier of Marqui; Marqui provides a web-based software solution that enables marketers to manage and measure their online publicity and promotion campaigns more effectively.

See you there!

[tags] vef, vancouver enterprise forum, vancouver, meetup, john koetsier [/tags]

social media ephemera

Just saw that Lauren Wood is lamenting disappearing blogs.

I’ve noticed a few blogs disappearing over the past few months, blogs I used to enjoy reading and had pointed out to people. I find it disappointing when people decide to get rid of the entire blog [ … ] since I think the web as a whole loses something when parts of it disappear.

Very likely the data and posts that made up any blogs that actually had any reasonable following and linkage is still available. I know people who reconstructed blogs lost due to hardware failures out of Google cache. Plus, with services like the Internet Archive wayback machine, web content doesn’t have to disappear into the mist.

But that’s not the point.

Deleting blogs and deleting blog posts is like cutting ex-spouses out of family pictures. It’s almost like re-writing history, or just erasing it. Makes me think of Orwell’s MinTrue.

Maybe that’s just a tad bit extreme. 😉

[tags] blogging, social media, ephemera, lost data, john koetsier [/tags]

whoosh

With pride and joy and humility: under 15,000.

technorati-15k.png

Thanks to everyone who has linked to bizhack – the last 5 who linked and tracked back are in the sidebar under the Text Link Ads non-text link image. 😉

Err … don’t let the “whoosh” title of this post deceive you. It’s been a long, hard, slow process. But very, very fun and rewarding.

[tags] technorati, 15000, bizhack, john koetsier [/tags]

Slumming 90’s style with geocities & tripod

Remember Geocities and Tripod? Remember how huge they were in the late 90’s?

I saw a blah.tripod.com address on the back of a beat-up pickup truck on the way home today – a cheap web hosting account for a small business, of course. Brought me back a decade or so, when Geocities and Tripod were the MySpace and YouTube of the day.

The funny thing is, when you go to their pages right now, they’re basically selling hosting. Only Tripod has a mini, after-thought, bottom-of-the-page listing of member sites.

Just imagine what these properties could have done if they would have had the foresight to be a Digg, a Newsvine, even a Bloglines or Technorati. If there’s anything those companies have taught us, it’s that there’s gold in the long tail.

Tripod and Geocities traffic shows just a slight downward trend over the past half a year, but that’s misleading. When the rising tide that should lift all boats is not lifting yours, you probably have a leaky hull.

How the mighty have fallen.

[tags] geocities, tripod, long tail, social, aggregator, john koetsier [/tags]

social and anti-social: networking vs blogging

And now for something completely different: an acknowledgement of complete and utter ignorance. A thought hit me today …

Why do some people blog, and others join social networks?

In other words, why are so many millions joining MySpace and other social networking sites, and so many other millions (but definitely few millions) creating their own blogs – whether on services like WordPress.com or Blogger or Typepad, or just on their own servers?

Are those of us who make our own blogs more independent? Iconoclastic? Individualistic? Less socially needy? Or do we want contact with many other people also, but in a less structured, broader context where we have more individual control?

I wonder about crossover. How many have MySpace accounts, FaceBook accounts, and their own separate blogs. And here I’m not thinking about people who blog and have a MySpace account to just sort of stay in touch with what others are doing – I fit in that category too. But if I log into my MySpace account once in a month’s time there’s something unusual going on. How many blog and use a social networking service regularly?

I wonder …

. . .
. . .

By the way, don’t interpret the title of this post to mean that I think blogging is anti-social and social networking is social. It’s just a title, meant to get your attention. Guess it worked. 😉

[tags] myspace, facebook, blogging, social networking, john koetsier [/tags]

AdSense CPM: $3-4

I had never believed it, but you can easily make $3-4 per thousand pageviews with AdSense.

My thinking only a few months ago was that at best, advertising could give you about $1 CPM. Not so. My CPM this month is almost $2, and spiking on certain days and for certain articles well into the $5-6 CPM range.

I suspect a site like PlentyofFish would be even higher. It obviously makes a ton of money …

[tags] adsense, adwords, CPM, blogging, john koetsier [/tags]

bizhack now on media temple grid server

Media Temple has finally launched its grid server product, and I’ve migrated all my blogs and assorted services over to the new machines.

This is the latest cutting-edge hosting tech – as those who are familiar with grids probably recognize, it’s no longer tied to a specific machine. Instead, all my services now reside on a linked grid of servers that operate as effectively one massive resource pool – instantly scalable, instantly provisionable, fault tolerant, clustered, and otherwise buzzword compliant.

If you’re looking for hosting, I recommend Media Temple. For $20/month you get all those advantages that essentially take your site way beyond the limitations of either shared hosting (where most hosts stuff as many clients on one box as possible) or dedicated server hosting (where all your resources are yours, but if there’s a fault on the box, sayonara to your services).

Fairly healthy specs, too:

  • 100 GBs of premium storage
  • 1 TB of short-path bandwidth
  • 100 unique sites / alternate domains
  • 64MB Ruby/Mongrel container
  • 1,000 GPUs
  • 100 databases
  • 1,000 email addresses

$20 for 100 GBs of storage? That’s unheard of. And a full terabyte of bandwidth is absolutely mind-blowingly fat. 100 databases will let me play with all kinds of services, and the dedicated RoR container is very nice for a sandboxed app with its own dedicated resources.

Plus, as mentioned, it’s all burstable on-the-fly, so if you hit any limits in disk or throughput, Media Temple will automatically allocate more resources. You’ll pay for them, I’m sure, but it’s a much preferable solution to the “this account has exceeded its transfer allocation” nonsense you see occasionally after a site hits the Digg home page or gets slashdotted.

So much space, so much bandwidth. I feel like a eaglet just learning to fly.

. . .
. . .

Update: As I’m checking out all my blogs and services, I’m just blown away by the speed. Wow – I’m getting easily 3-4 times the speed that I had on Media Temple’s shared hosting service. Impressive.

Incidentally, check out where this goes: gridserver.com

[tags] media temple, hosting, grid computing, web hosting, john koetsier [/tags]

don’t send me tech-savvy readers

I may have mentioned that bizhack hit Techmeme a couple of days ago.

Maybe I’m in the wrong racket. Perhaps I should be hawking hi-tech boy toys or celebrity juice. I’ve never served out more pages and gotten fewer AdSense clicks. Who knew that geeks don’t click on ads?

Perhaps they’re just like me. The horror!

[tags] ads, techmeme, geeks, adsense, adwords, google, traffic, john koetsier [/tags]

Performancing ad network for bloggers: set your own prices

In most markets, buyers and sellers cooperate to set prices: supply and demand. Until recently, that was not true of contextual text link advertising.

I posted about it a couple of days ago: Google AdWords/AdSense maintains a lock on pricing for ads showing on your site. Why can’t bloggers have a hand in determining what they’d let ad space on their blogs go for?

Well, I just got an email from Nick Wilson at Performancing … and that time has come. Performancing is opening up their ad network to bloggers. And as you can see here, bloggers will be able to set their own pricing. The announcement is not official yet – that’s forthcoming. But the option is exciting.

Publishers have the opportunity to set their own prices on a per blog basis. It is not however, what we recommend for the vast majority of our partners. auto pricing is a clever little algorithm that examines your blogs projected impression and click stats, factors in other data gained from similar blogs and aggregated data from your category and determines a fair price for a 30 day spot on your blog.

  • The goal of auto pricing is to set the optimal value for an ad on your blog.
  • The cost of an ad on your blog will change as the market for that spot changes. Changes to your own statisitcs as well as similar blogs also influence the price.
  • You can opt-out of auto pricing at any time by hitting link by your blogs price under the “my blogs” tab.

Of course, Performancing does not recommend it … and I’m sure that for most bloggers, it isn’t a good idea. But for a strictly niched and popular blog, this could double or triple revenue.

Note that Performancing also gives bloggers 70-75% of the ad sale price … whereas we don’t really know what Google is selling ads for or how much margin they’re making. This again can only help bloggers make more money.

Which is not a bad thing!

[tags] ads, performancing, contextual, bloggers, problogger, adsense, adwords [/tags]

I am not Judge Glenda Hatchett

Just to clarify matters, I am not black, female, a lawyer, a judge, an American, a celebrity, a TV personality, or a big-bucks keynote speaker.

Other than that, Judge Glenda Hatchett and I have a ton in common. In fact, we might as well be the same person. To many, apparently, we are.

(If you’re wondering why I’m posting this odd denial, please see the comments on this post published earlier in the year.)

[tags] glenda hatchett, john koetsier, mistakes [/tags]

Techmeme: because no-one actually searches anymore

Am I a newbie Techmeme user who just doesn’t grok it, or is it truly crazy that Techmeme does not have a search function?

I mean, I get the Archives thing, but I find it a little cumbersome to be switching out dates manually, typing in when I think the story I’m looking for might have been on the front page. It’s a little archaic, frankly.

When I know exactly what story I’m looking for, and I have two or three keywords that I can search on to find it … why should I have to manipulate Techmeme space and Techmeme time just to find what I want?

That’s what computers are for. That’s what search is for.

…
…

See also: Scoble’s recent Techmeme comparison, Steve Rubel on Techmeme and language, Read/Write Web on Techmeme vs. TailRank, Frank Gruber on how TailRank is competing with Techmeme, speculation about a Techmeme blacklist, and a review of Techmeme’s well-regarded new ad format.

[tags] techmeme, search, usability, john koetsier [/tags]

Blog marketing is heating up: bloggers need pitch policies

Bloggers need pitch policies these days. The marketing contacts to bloggers are increasing exponentially – hardly a day goes by that I don’t get pitched to review some product, check some site, add some link.

Recently, I seem to have been put on some list by a Nancy Hendrickson at Author Marketing Experts (blog), who may have noticed that I review most books that I read (including some on my personal blog).

It’s always wonderful to get an email addressed “Dear ______ ,” with a tagline saying Powered by Campaigner, an email marketing package. It’s even better when I notice that the email says “You are subscribed as john.koetsier@gmail.com. To unsubscribe please click here.” Naturally, I have no recollection of having subscribed to any such list, nor does an email to Nancy result in any reply.

(I wonder how many of you will click that link to unsubscribe me.)

Phil Gomes – a lawyer at Edelman – started having this problem in 2005. In response, his pitch policy includes:

  • The email you send is clearly sent to me and not to a list.
  • You yourself (or members of the company you represent) actively and thoughtfully blog.
  • You are a blogger or member of the media and you’ve written/posted something interesting that might have missed my watchful gaze

That’s a great start. Here’s when not to contact me. Don’t even bother trying to contact me when:

  • you don’t blog
  • you don’t “get” blogging
  • you don’t answer to a reply
  • you use email list software to talk to me
  • you haven’t even taken at least a cursory look at my blog
  • you aren’t going to follow through on the things you say you’ll do

I don’t mind getting email from fellow bloggers. I don’t mind getting a link and a request to check it out, or to add it to my SLOB hall of fame.

I do mind being used.

[tags] marketing, pr, blogging, advertising, john koetsier [/tags]

Edelman, Wal-Mart, Steve Rubel: head, meet sand

Update Oct. 16. Edelman has finally broke the silence: Steve Rubel’s post; Richard Edelman’s post. No word on what exactly went wrong, or why the “process” that Steve talks about took over a week. More later …

It’s been almost a week. The blogosphere is talking about Edelman, Wal-Mart, and the fake blog. I added my three cents a few days ago.

In short, we’ve been waiting, listening, and watching for the explanation. Or the mea culpa. But none has been forthcoming.

Steve, you need to speak up
I hate to put this all on Steve, but sorry, you’re the best-known highly-placed Edelman blogger. And it’s not like you haven’t posted recently.

Your blog’s about page identifies that you are Edelman’s thought leader on social media:

Rubel is charged with helping Edelman identify, test, incubate and champion new forms of communications that get people talking across new platforms and channels.

Well guess what – no one needs leadership when everything is fine. Leadership is required when the smelly stuff hits the fan. And yes, right now it is hitting the fan – hard.

Yeah, it is conversational media
Steve, your blog also claims that you are “widely viewed as an expert on conversational marketing.” I think most people in the blogosphere would agree wth that assessment.

But what happens to the conversation when one participant doesn’t speak?

When that happens, there is no conversation. There’s no communication. And you have no chance to even influence or affect the thoughts and actions of your potential clients, your potential allies, your potential listeners.

We’re making it up as we go along
Just because you’re not talking doesn’t mean we won’t talk. And if you won’t tell us your side of the story, it won’t be told. This is strikingly similar to the Marshall Manson incident, which raised questions about Edelman, Wal-Mart, and proper disclosure of interest.

In response to that incident, Richard Edelman said the following:

Let me get the disclosure out of the way. Edelman is the PR firm working with bloggers as part of a Wal-Mart corporate image campaign. Edelman is transparent about its relationship with Wal-Mart in our communications to bloggers. It’s clear who we represent.

So get the disclosure out of the way
As I noted in my first post on Edelman and Wal-Mart, Jaffe Juice has said that “this is the SECOND time they’ve been outed for lack of transparency with the SAME client.”

How transparent is Edelman? How much disclosure is there? How clear is it who you represent? Your silence is deafening. The answers to those questions is unclear.

My suggestion: make it clear. Now.

Consequences: blowback
This will hit TechMeme, and the consequences could be severe.

For example, how effective do you think any further social media campaigns sponsored by Edelman will be if bloggers don’t trust you? And how successful will Edelman be if it cannot deliver social media PR results to its clients?

The answer to both questions is, obviously: not very.

. . .
. . .

Other blogs discussing this issue:

Pinko marketing in grayscale companies

What’s a savvy new-media social-web podcasting-blogging-story-telling marketer supposed to do in a company that thinks dead-tree news outlets are cutting edge?

Gino mentioned this problem at the Pinko Marketing Blog:

So, my new job (which has taken a lot of my time recently!) seems to conflict with my blogging.

Many house builders barely have a marketing department to speak of and those that do work in a very simple and formulaic fashion.

So where does Pinko marketing fit in with these people? Is there ANY point in trying to speak to these people a) about blogging and b) about Pinko Marketing.

My response, which I posted as a comment, is as follows:

That’s a tough one – particularly as the business you’re working for may not feel like it really needs to establish a long-term relationship with clients … after all, how many times is a client going to buy a home from you?

I will say one thing: forcing a marketing model on people who just don’t get it will not work.

  1. it’s not real for the company, so it’s not authentic, so it won’t ring true over time
  2. when people don’t understand you, or understand new things you want to do, they have a very strong incentive to think that you’re stupid, because this saves them the difficulty of rationalizing the fact that they don’t get it. So its a bit dangerous, personally. (Especially in a new job)

Suggestion:
Get some wins. Establish a track record. Then start moving downfield in the direction you want to go … slowly, but purposefully.

When trying to change a corporate culture, slow is fast and fast is slow. The only possible exception is when the company is faced with a life-threatening challenge and must adapt quickly or die painfully.

And something that isn’t real for an organization isn’t sustainable.

[tags] marketing, social media, blogs, PR, pinko marketing, corporate culture, john koetsier [/tags]

Bloggers: ping Google too

Most bloggers have their software set up to automatically “ping” blog monitoring sites when they publish a new post. The most common and simplest ping service is Pingomatic, which will notify 27 different blog monitoring sites that you’ve updated your site.

However, I just noticed that the very slowly-evolving Google Blog Search has added a ping service of its own. If you want to inform Google instantly when you update your blog, simply add http://blogsearch.google.com/ping/RPC2 to the list of services you ping.

Dave Taylor has a most excellent guide to adding the Google Blog Search ping for bloggers who use Movable Type. (I suspect that the process would be very similar if you’re using TypePad, which is made by the same company: Six Apart.)

If you’re using WordPress, however, you’ll need to jump into your Admin interface, click on Options, then on Writing, and paste the boldface URL above into this box:

Now you’re telling Google who to spider, and spider now. But does it work? Yes it does, and fast. Extremely fast.

In fact, when I checked Google Blog Search within minutes of publishing an early version of this post, here’s what I found:

Notice that “2 minutes ago” under the title? That’s Google speed – wow. It’s amazing what you can do with virtually unlimited bandwidth, half a million servers, and gobs of human talent.

I still wish they’d buy Technorati.

[tags] google, blog search, ping, pingomatic, movable type, six apart, typepad, wordpress, john koetsier [/tags]

Trackbacks, comments added to sidebar

Little public service announcement here …

I just added Recent Comments and Recent Trackbacks to the sidebar. (You may have to scroll a little to see them.

I’ve set it up so that anyone who adds a trackback link in their post that links to bizhack, they’ll automagically get a link back in the sidebar.

Same thing with comments: the commenter’s name will link back to his or her blog; and the first few characters of the comment will link to the post in question.

What’s the big idea?
My goals with this are three-fold: encouraging more linking and commenting, thanking people who are linking and commenting, and rewarding linking and commenting. It is, after all, the social web.

(And yes – full disclosure – I get a kick out of every link and comment. Thank you!)

Please return to your regularly-scheduled programming …

[tags] bizhack, john koetsier, trackbacks, comments [/tags]

Scoble’s video podcasts: half a show

Scoble is talking to all the most interesting and cool people in the business. Too bad he’s only letting us get half the show.

For instance, today he mentioned that he’s talked to Even Krauss of Cuts, a movie editing service. The video is great quality, and Evan is interesting and articulate. Great. Excellent.

But I can’t hear Scoble to save my life.

Which effectively means that when I watch the Scobleshow, I can hear precisely half of a conversation. Or I can turn up the volume so that Evan is screaming and Scoble is just barely audible.

That’s a little annoying.

[tags] scoble, scobleshow, video, podcast, cuts, evan krauss, john koetsier [/tags]

Why won’t Google let bloggers control AdSense price minimums?

I just checked my AdSense revenue for today and noticed a click that paid me a stunning total of three bloody cents.

I mean, I appreciate the long tail of just about anything as much as anyone, but boy-oh-boy! That has got to be the skinny prehensile appendage of pay-per-click text advertising.

Which got me thinking: AdWords is currently set up so that advertisers can decide what they are willing to pay. Then Google automagics the numbers so that they pay only a penny more than then next most profligate advertiser.

All well and good.

But what if Google set up AdSense so that publishers (that’s me and you) can decide at what price they are willing to sell? Then Google would automagically set up advertisers and publishers with matching parameters – kind of like an electronic ad dating service.

(AdWords and AdSense are two sides of the same coin: AdWords is the advertiser side, where ads are purchased; AdSense is the publisher side, where ads are displayed.)

I’d like to be able to set minimums for my ad space. Why won’t Google let me do that?

[tags] google, adsense, adwords, publisher, advertiser, pay-per-click, john koetsier [/tags]

Blogs, splogs, & flogs: Edelman & the Wal-Mart fiasco

Update Oct. 16. Edelman has finally broke the silence: Steve Rubel’s post; Richard Edelman’s post. No word on what exactly went wrong, or why the “process” that Steve talks about took over a week. More later …

If Edelman is the PR agency that “gets it” about blogs and social media, why did they set up a fake blog for Wal-Mart?

Blogs are weblogs. Splogs are spam blogs. Flogs are stealth PR blogs. And as far as we can see today, Edelman set up a flog for Wal-Mart that has now been outted: Wal-Marting Across America.

It’s a sweet story about Jim and Laura RV-ing across America from Wal-Mart to Wal-Mart – staying in store parking lots overnight. The only problem is that Jim and Laura don’t exist … at least not in the way presented in the now-closed blog.

“Laura” is Laura St. Claire, a freelance writer. Jim is James Thresher, a professional photographer and Washington Post employee. Freelancing, apparently, is against his contract with the Post, which has ordered him to return Wal-Mart’s money and remove his photos from the flog. According to that AP story:

Wal-Mart outfitted the RV and turned it over to Thresher and his partner, Laura St. Claire, who drove it cross-country,

What’s shocking is that Wal-Mart is a client of Edeleman, which is the PR agency is supposed to be the one that “gets it” with regard to social media. But this isn’t “getting it,” and in fact is causing the worst kind of nightmare for a PR agency: blowback on its media-bending efforts.

Not only is the Examiner writing about the issue, so is MediaPost and Editor & Publisher. And the bloggers are not being silent.

What are bloggers saying?
In a word: lots. Here’s a sampling …

Jaffe Juice:

This post is not about Wal-Mart. They’ll figure out social media sooner or later.

This post is about Edelman. I’m kind of surprised and a bit amazed quite frankly…as this is the SECOND time they’ve been outed for lack of transparency with the SAME client.

Strategic Public Relations

I’m giving Edelman the Goofus and the Gallant on furthering the use of social media in the public relations industry. This tactic could have worked using full disclosure, just interview the customers and get their stories. It might not have resulted in effusive praise for the giant smiley face, but it would have been interesting nonetheless.

On Message from Wagner Communications:

Pro-Wal-Mart Travel Blog Screeches To A Halt.

Toughsledding:

International social media champion Edelman Public Relations finds itself the target of accusations it created “a phony blog” as a front for client and retail giant WalMart … Arrived home a few minutes ago (8:45 EDT) and have been unable to find a response on the Edelman website, or any of Edelman’s numerous bloggers.

PR Squared:

This is wrong on so many levels. And it is Strike 3 for Edelman (not Strike 2, as Joseph Jaffe suggests). Edelman, the self-described leader in me2, in transparency, in Social Media PR strategies. (Or, maybe not.)

Thunderous silence from Edelman
Richard Edelman says that “the business community … must recognize a new axis of communications, the horizontal peer to peer conversation.” How peer-to-peer was the Wal-Mart blog? And why is he not responding to the issue?

Steve Rubel is probably the best-known Edelman blogger. He posted twice today … but not a word about the Wal-Mart account.

The Edelman Landing Blog appears to be a conglomeration of all Edelman blogs. Once again, not a word.

Summing it up
Learn the lesson of Scoble, who humanized Microsoft while being honest about the fact that Microsoft paid his mortgage. Learn the lesson of all the other successful corporate bloggers.

  1. You want to start a corporate blog? Great. Be upfront about it.
  2. You want to start a marketing blog and get paid for it? Great. Be honest about who you are.
  3. You want to start a PR blog for your client? Great. Tell us who you are and who your client is.

You want to do that fake stuff? Keep it where it belongs, in mainstream media.

Thank you Amy Stephen

The worst thing about blogging is the nasty flame wars that we start. The best thing is the deep understanding that we can develop.

I have to, have to, have to believe that we can grow, we can learn, we can get better, become more, learn more, understand more, listen more, and improve our lives and ourselves through blogging and reading blogs.

Thank you Amy Stephen for renewing that trust.

I’m listening; you’re listening. You’re speaking; I’m speaking. We’re both learning.

Thank you.

[tags] amy stephen, blogging, respect, listening, john koetsier [/tags]

Blogrolls and sex: what does gender have to do with it?

Would it be OK if I suddenly established a policy of only linking to male bloggers? What if I only added posts by men to my list of interesting links?

I’m extremely reluctant to blog about this. I want to do it with the utmost respect and integrity. But I can’t just ignore what I see, and I want to publicly ask some questions about it.

I recently followed a link to Charlene Li’s Calculating the ROI of Blogging. It’s a great exploration of how to measure the return on investment for blogging, particularly for PR and marketing managers.

Nobody will ever win the battle of the sexes. There’s too much fraternizing with the enemy.”
– Henry Kissinger

But I happened to notice her blogroll. It’s the type of blogroll that is generated and/or managed by an external site – in this case, BlogHer. And every single blog in the blogroll is a woman’s blog. Is that kosher?

Well, yes!
In a lot of ways, of course, that’s completely kosher. People – any people – can choose to link to anyone they want to. Conversely, they can choose not to link to anyone they don’t wish to link to.

A natural extension of this is that people – Charlene Li in this case – can promote any particular person she wants to, and not promote others.

Fine and good – on a personal level.

What about other insights?
I should note, however, that Charlene’s blog is not a personal blog. It’s a business blog. She works for Forrester – a research and business intelligence blog. In fact, the content is copyrighted by Forrester – it’s an extension of their business.

With that in mind, is she saying that no matter which blogger of whatever gender has excellent and insightful comments … she only going to link to those without a Y chromosome? If so, I have less respect for her and less respect for her opinions. She simply isn’t valuing a certain fraction of the intelligence out there.

But it’s not that simple
However, that’s not quite the case. A cursory examination of her recent posts reveals links to TechCrunch and PoliBlog … both blogs by men.

So she doesn’t have a kneejerk blanket policy against linking to men. Far from it.

Ambivalence
Essentially, then, I’m ambivalent about Charlene Li’s blogroll policy. Ultimately, any blogger has the right to do what she wants, but his or her choices may reflect on her business credibility.

I wonder what would happen, however, if a prominent male blogger published a blogroll from BlogHim containing only links to male bloggers. (Devil’s advocate: would anyone notice?) But I realize that traditionally – and in technology-oriented fields – women have been under-represented in public life. So it’s not quite the same thing.

People are people
All the same, I wouldn’t do it if I were her. I just don’t like the idea of dealing with people based on classification or categorization. I much prefer to deal with each individual as an individual.

But then again, I’m not Charlene Li. And I’m not a woman – and I’ve not had to deal with what some women (all women) have had to deal with on their path through the business world. Or the world itself.

What do you think?

Much ado about nothing? A valid sense of unease? Or clear evidence of an unreconstructed male chauvinist?

[tags] blogher, women blogger, blogroll, charlene li, links, john koetsier [/tags]

Aww shucks …

Leo Bottary at Client Service Insights said some really complementary things about this blog today. Thanks – and I’m humbled.

I’m in awe of blogs like bizhack, for example. John Koetsier teaches me something new about the medium nearly every day. And there are certainly other blogs that fall into this category as well.

The most important thing I can bear in mind about the world we live and do business in today is that the only constant is change. Which means that we are all learning, all the time. My goal is simply to keep learning.

The only certainty is that I’ll make mistakes. Say something wrong. Misplace a fact. Underestimate a trend. Dispell a rumor that turns out to be true.

But I refuse to stop thinking, talking, drawing conclusions, writing … out of fear of error. That way lies paralysis.

You miss 100% of the shots you don’t take.
– Wayne Gretzky

What I will do is be open, honest, humble, admit mistakes – and correct them when I make them.

To me, that’s the beauty and the magic of blogging.

. . .
. . .

(By the way, Leo has some great insights of his own. In particular, I thought his best client service lesson ever was one of those great foundational principles that we need to embed in our bones before we’ll ever, ever be able to understand what great client service is for our specific clients. Hint: truly understand the client first!)

[tags] bizhack, leo bottary, client service insights, blogging, mistakes, john koetsier [/tags]

What I want to know from Google AdSense

A couple of weeks ago I stuck Google AdSense ads on the right sidebar of this blog. I won’t get rich on the proceeds unless I get very, very old … but it should pay for my server. Here’s my question, though:

What posts are generating adwords clicks?

I’d really like to know. What kinds of posts generate clicks?

Whether I decide to write more of those or not is another question, but it’d be nice to know. Also, which ads enticed the click?

As far as I can see – and I’ve only re-enabled ads on this site a couple of weeks ago – there is no way to track or find this information. The only tracking information you can generate is based on what you put into the system: channels.

Well, that’s helpful for those who have multiple blogs (like me). You can set up a channel for each blog and monitor which one are profitable. But that’s not very fine-grained data … and I’m not going to set up a channel for each post.

Why the secrecy?
Why is this information not readily available? Wouldn’t it be in Google’s best interests to have bloggers and site owners more able to write the kinds of posts that generate clicks?

Would this data enable click fraud artists?

I assume there are reasons not to do this. I assume that Google has thought of this and decided not to do it. And I further assume that perhaps they are concerned about fraud and gaming the system.

But for the life of me I can’t figure out why.

[tags] adsense, google, adwords, data, clicks, john koetsier [/tags]

Subscribe to my Substack