Tag - blogging

CoComment – easy blog conversation tracking

Just a few days ago I talked about CoComment and regretted that tracking your comments across all the blogs that you follow is so difficult.

Basically, what I was looking for was a way to track my comments without doing anything. Anything extra that is, besides posting the comment. I don’t want to book mark it, I don’t want to tag it (in most cases), I don’t want to RSS track it: I just want one place that keeps a complete record of all the comments that I post on sites all over the internet.

Fortunately Stephanie Booth, who works at CoComment, saw my post, investigated, and found a solution.

There’s a CoComment plugin for Flock … which will essentially track your comments and archive them at CoComment (here’s my conversations; yours will be somewhere else). Very simple, very easy, very quick, very effortless … as in no extra effort.

I feel like I’ve hit the jackpot. I feel so good, in fact that I’ve integrated CoComment into this blog as well. Here are the instructions. According to CoComment, this:

  • Ensures that titles and urls are correctly detected
  • Enables all comments to be tracked
  • Does not depend on your visitors using a bookmarklet or browser extension

Important
If you want to integrate CoComment on your blog – and it’s a good, neighborly, net-citizen-in-good-standing kind of thing to do – don’t get frightened by the wall of explanatory text on the instructions page.

Just scroll right down to the examples. Chances are good they have a ready-made example for your blogging platform of choice, and you can just copy and paste what you need.

I started with their generic code and was poking through my WordPress install to ensure I had all the right bits of PHP code and variables … and then saw the example, which had everything correctly configured right out of the box.

It’ll save you a couple of minutes.

[tags] cocomment, stephanie booth, blogs, blogging, comments, posts, conversations, tracking, john koetsier [/tags]

Marketing genius: 50 site (re)designs

Web Designs from Scratch, a small British web design/consultancy firm, has hit on an amazingly bright idea to promote their firm, build their brand, bring in business, and just simply do something really cool: 50 Redesigns from Scratch.

It reminds me of One Thousand Paintings: the painter who is painting a thousand paintings (naturally), of the numbers 1 to 1000.

50 Redesigns from Scratch is genius. They’ll take 50 sites, redesign them, blog about them, write about them in a PDF book which will be available for download, and also write about them in an actual book which can be purchased. They’ve already got a mention on Digg with more than 1100 Diggs (including one from me), and other links are sure to follow.

The real genius is that this project, which is from a “company” which is so non-corporate as to have a Paypal donate button on their home page, is also going to be a money-maker. That’s right: this is not just a publicity stunt or a goodwill gesture:

We can only include a limited number of sites in the book. If you would like your site to be included, we’d love to hear from you.

– A one-off fee of just £725 (US$1,250) gets you:

– A professional redesign of your site’s home page by Ben Hunt

– Your site included in the book, and featured on this site, where it will be seen by like half a million people – guaranteeing great exposure

– All graphics files of the new design you need to help you implement your new design

At one and the same time, they’ve:

  • made this an artificially limited opportunity – hence making it more attractive in some intangibly human way
  • made this an event – which makes it much more interesting for companies or bloggers to buy in
  • promised clients something Joe’s Graphics down the corner (or even a top-flight $150/hour downtown agency) can’t offer: publicity
  • plus, as you can see by their first design, a simply great re-design for their website

What a concept – great marketing/branding/business development coup, all in one. Not to mention how much fun this should be!

[tags] marketing, buzz, viral, web2.0, webdesign, scratchmedia, web design from scratch, john koetsier [/tags]

Eight ideas that will really revolutionize the 21st Century

Ben Hammersley had a presentation at Les Blogs recently titled “Eight ideas that will really revolutionize the 21st century (and why blogging isn’t one of them).”

I tried to watch the video, but a combination of poor quality and Ben’s hard-on-a-Canadian’s-ear English accent made it virtually impossible. (To say nothing of the pain, the pain I say, of trying to watch Windows Media files.)

Fortunately, a Dutch blogger has posted some of the main ideas. With apologies to my ancestors, I can’t read Dutch, but here’s the key bit in English.

Looks like 8 dichotomies or continuums of ideas:

– information wants to be free —- copyright
– zero distance — borders
– mass amateurisation — censorship
– more much more — network blocking
– true names — identity cards and databases
– viral behaviour — more network blocking
– everything is personal — everything is trackable
– ubiquitous computing — no privacy

Sounds very cool – I still want a complete transcript. Someone – anyone?

. . .
. . .

I’ve downloaded the MP3 audio – hopefully it’s better than the video.

[tags] ben hammersley, les blogs, ideas, revolution, blogging, john koetsier [/tags]

No, diversity won’t drown Digg

Vishnu Mahmud of Indonesia has an interested editorial on C|Net on whether Digg’s recent move to multiple topics (rather than just technology) will ruin Digg.

Suppose we have more Europeans or Asians or South Americans, how much would the site be different? Instead of having news about an American sheriff, we could perhaps have complaints about a Glasgow soup merchant (“No soup for you!”) or more corruption stories from Southeast Asia (which judging by my local newspapers is pretty extensive).

Some Internet users cite Digg as a bastion of liberals that can be easily misinformed by slanted news coverage, leading to virtual verbal fisticuffs. What happens if Digg has more conservative users (regardless of nationality), who by the strength of their majority can control the editorial content of the site? They can provide the most diggs to a story. Democracy is democracy.

Technology is a common denominator, Vishnu says, that keeps the site focused and keeps his attention there.

Stating the obvious
Well, first of all, to state the obvious, you can still view the site only in Technology mode. In fact, that’s the default mode. So on that basis along, there should be nothing to worry about. Just like on Slashdot where you can set preferences to not see stories on certain topics or stories by certain authors, Digg will let you merrily stay in the Technology box. News about American sheriffs will whiz by you, happily and joyfully unnoticed.

Localization
Secondly, as Digg gets more and more popular, I’d imagine that Kevin Rose and company will simply introduce a localization mode which will work much the same way: enabling you to set preferences on which stories you want to see.

So, for instance, if you want all Technology stories, but only Entertainment, World & Business, and Video stories that originate or relate to Indonesia, you’d be able to do that.

Localization is an imperfect art, of course – witness Google News – but it generally works well enough to keep most people reasonably satisfied.

Even more powerful
Adding localization would make Digg even better. I probably wouldn’t use it, because I visit Digg to keep a finger on the pulse of the internet zeitgeist, and I want to see it all.

But many might, and the result would be the de factor formation of any number of groups of users, each focusing on issues of concern to them.

Better and better
I can’t see the addition of further topics as anything but good news for Digg and good news for those that use Digg.

Any problems that arise through dilution of the archetypal Digg user can be solved with fairly simple techniques that are well understood and currently utilized.

[tags] digg, kevin rose, Vishnu Mahmud, C|Net, localization, zeitgeist, john koetsier [/tags]

.Net Passport is .Annoying

I wanted to comment on a MSN Spaces blog posting today. Unfortunately, it requires a .Net Passport.

Like many other Mac and Linux types, I’ve always resisted getting one … Microsoft and security and all that. But the thought struck me: I have an account at just about every other web service on the planet. Get over your prejudices and go get that Passport account.

Well. Somebody pinch me and wake me up. Identity management shouldn’t be this hard. .Net Passport is a Microsoft trademarked name that bears significant resemblance to Plug & Play: both are oxymorons.

The first stage (and yes, there are many) starts with way too much information (I don’t want to give Microsoft my email address, or create one with Microsoft) and ends with way too little: the now-ubiquitous prove-you’re-human guess what the squiggly lines mean step:

This is my second chance; I failed the first one. Wonder if I’d pass the Turing test.

That’s minor, though, compared to the next step. It’s titled personal information, and contrary to the name of this whole identity management service, it means what it says. Emphasis on the personal.

Birth date. Gender (they mean sex; there are 3 genders and 2 sexes … well, mostly). OK, I can kind of swallow those.

But occupation? Industry? Job title? Marital status? Children in home?

It seems to me that these questions have a lot more to do with Microsoft’s (or someone’s) ability to classify me as a consumer – a particular level of consumer – and market specifically to me. Sorry, not interested.

I had to cancel – and all I wanted was to post a single comment on an MSN Spaces blog.

I think this is what happens when you have MBAs designing web services. Please, please take a lesson from 37 Signals: only ask for the information you need, when you need it. You can always get more later: if it makes sense. If it’s tied to something your client wants to do.

But if you ask too much, you may not get anything at all.

[tags] microsoft, .Net, Passport, identity, Sxip, MSN, Spaces, john koetsier [/tags]

Rocketboom: maybe the blogosphere IS high school, after all

As I was shaking up my blog look and construction about half a year ago, I remember reading Jakob Nielsen’s alertbox on blog usability.

One of the things that stuck with me is Jakob’s insistence that the internet is not high school:

A related mistake in this category is to use insider shorthand, such as using first names when you reference other writers or weblogs. Unless you’re writing only for your friends, don’t alienate new visitors by appearing to be part of a closed clique. The Web is not high school.

Hrm. The whole RocketBoom breakup episode has me thinking. What if the blogosphere really is high school after all?

Think about it:

The top of the heap
You’ve got high status bloggers – A-list, B-list, whatever-list: they exist. They are the jocks or preppies or whatever the jargon-du-jour is.

Andrew Baron and Amanda Congdon are among those elite. So are others who are blogging about the high-profile spat: Michael Arrington and Dave Winer.

First names, please
Dave apparently didn’t get Jakob’s memo; he’s still on a first-name-only basis:

What we know and don’t know about Amanda, Andrew and Rocketboom:

Nowhere in Amanda’s video does she say she was fired.

High profile break-up, lots of rumors
Isn’t it so high school … the cheerleader prom queen and the football quarterback break up and everybody starts talking about it.

I mean everybody. No, e-v-e-r-y-o-n-e.

Sheesh. There’s even lousy pictures drawn on bathroom walls about it.

And, of course, the other really cool guy on campus has just muscled in and started sweet-talking the now-lonely and bereft cheerleader.

Staying at mom and dad’s
And naturally, since this is high school, everyone is still living at home – even though they wish they were moving to L.A. and making it big in movies. Sure sucks to be at home:

I’m presently living with my parents in Connecticut until I can get back on my feet.

World-famous in Poughkeepsie
The world may be an oyster, or an oyster the world. In high school, it’s high school. Apparently in the blogosphere it is no different.

Earth to blogosphere: no one else knows. No one else cares.

It will end, won’t it?
Ahhh … enough of the dirty laundry.

The best thing about high school is that like all school, indeed all things, it ends.

And so, hopefully, will this far-too-public childish spat.

Please!

[tags] rocketboom, amanda congdon, andrew baron, unboomed, techcrunch, scripting news, high school, blogosphere, john koetsier [/tags]

Tracking blog conversations easily?

Today I signed up for a Cocomment account in the hope that it would help me keep track of all the comments that I leave on other people’s blogs.

That was, of course, before I knew that I would have to install a bookmarklet in my browser, which I would have to click every time I enter a comment. That seems like a little bit too much hassle. I already have bookmarks for favorites and

There is a plugin which will apparently do it automatically, if you use Firefox, but I am currently using Flock, and don’t really want to switch.

Is there any other service out there for tracking your comments that just does it automatically? Maybe co.mments will do the job (see the TechCrunch post), but it looks like co.mments still requires some sort of bookmarking process. Hrm. I’ll wait for something a little more seamless.

In other news, you know a service is built by and for geeks when it calls a bunch of letters a “string.”

[tags] co.mments, cocomment, techcrunch, blogs, comments, john koetsier [/tags]

War of the spiders

What’s up with Yahoo!’s Slurp?

That’s the question I was asking myself last week as I was peering at my blog stats. More specifically, the stats for which robots had been visiting, sucking, spidering my sites.

Yahoo! Slurp is visiting my sites almost constantly … in this 7-day period it requested a file (image, page, you name it) 12,521 times. That’s about 9000 more hits than the Googlebot.

Here’s the graph. (Note: this is only the Mozilla-compatible spiders, which in total account for about half of the spidering on my sites.)

There are a ton of bots that hit any blogs that have more than 20 posts and a few links to them. I think I once counted 50 or 60 – and that was a year or more ago.

But why would Yahoo! Slurp account for 65% of the spider hits to my site? During the same period, the MSN bot accounted for about 1200 hits. I confess I don’t get it.

Somehow, Yahoo! wants to know everything, immediately, repeatedly. That’s OK, I’m just wondering why.

. . .

. . .

Interestingly enough, the Technorati bot is almost nowwhere to be seen, with something like 90 hits on my site in the 7-day period.

[tags] technoratibot, yahoo slurp, googlebot, spiders, MSNbot, john koetsier [/tags]

Flock rocks: first look at the new Flock browser

I am not a person who likes to try new core applications just for the heck of it. I seriously value aesthetics in all my core applications. And a web browser is, to me, a core application. Maybe about as core as you can get.

Which explains why I have never switched to Firefox.

But I’m trying Flock right now, and I have to say, I’m really really liking it. No really.

Trying it was a no-brainer, and painless too: Flock imported not only my bookmarks (very few) but also my cookies and saved passwords from Safari. Very cool.

This is not going to be an exhaustive review. In fact, it won’t be exhaustive at all – I’ve only started looking at the product. But, frankly, I’m excited about this new browser, and wanted to let people know.

Some of my first thoughts:

  1. The first look was good: typography seems much cleaner and better in Flock than in Firefox. So good first impressions.
  2. Flock has opened up my Flickr account to me in ways that I didn’t know were possible. It’s show me things I haven’t seen before in my friends’ and contacts’ accounts.
  3. I’m writing this in Flock – a very nice way to write and post articles on your blog. This article was my first Flock-written post; the one you’re reading right now is my second. That’s cool too.
  4. Posting links to my delicious account is MUCH easier than it was before, and much faster as well. Plus, I can search those far quicker with Flock than I can at del.icio.us itself!

I’m just starting to discover what Flock can do, but I’m very, very impressed.

[tags] flock, browser, safari, firefox, internet explorer, web 2.0, john koetsier [/tags]

Blogged with Flock

My cups run over

The cups are against me. Posting volume is down, and is not likely to improve for a while.

First of all, there’s the Stanley Cup. Then there’s the World Cup. And then there’s my cup, which by now is busily runneth-ing over.

Ice hockey is the best sport in the world, bar none. So that’s got first dibs on my attention. But soccer, sorry, fut-ball, is a pretty close second. And my favorite teams, England and the Netherlands, are doing well so far.

So don’t expect a ton of posts here over the next couple of weeks!

[tags] ice hockey, soccer, football, world cup, stanley cup, blogging, john koetsier [/tags]

Star bloggers getting traded: consequences?

Nicholas Carr recently posted an article about corporate bloggers and risk. If high-profile people like Robert Scoble leave, what does that do to the company?

(His comments on Roughtype are screwed up, so I’m posting this here.)

Among other things, he said:

So Microsoft’s self-styled human face is now some other company’s human face. This must be the first corporate human face transplant ever attempted. Will it take? Or will the new body reject the used puss?

… and …

A company should probably be a little nervous about letting some blogger set up shop as its human face. The earnings the blogger pulls in through the attention economy may accrue more to his own bottom line than the firm’s.

My reply, which I would have posted in his comments, but Typepad thinks I’m logged in but won’t post my comment, and then won’t let me log in, because I’m already logged in, even after I log out. Yay.

Agree it’s a problem. but …

What’s the alternative? Same old same old mass media we talk you listen approach? Won’t last long.

The better way is in good old-fashioned business logic: never put all your eggs in one basket. Encourage many employees to blog, rather than just one superstar.

And that is indeed the revolution that Scoble led at Microsoft.

Fix your comments, Nicholas!

[tags] nicholas carr, robert scoble, blogging, corporate, john koetsier [/tags]

Askismet: a blogger’s life-saver

Life has been extremely busy and draining for me lately – especially work.

So it’s nice to have Akismet on the blog comment-spam case. Just from the weekend, it caught 514 comment spams … so I didn’t have to. If you don’t have Akismet, and you blog, you need it.

(If you allow comments, that is. Whether a blog without comments is a blog or not we’ll leave for another day!)

Total comment spams caught on this blog are now 11,437. That’s over 11,000 spams that I didn’t even have to glance at!

Assuming each would only take me 5 seconds to check and approve or delete, that’s almost 16 hours of my life that Akismet has saved me. Wow.

(Of course, without it, I’d simply be forced to turn off comments. Which would not be cool.)

If you take a look at the “spam zeitgeist” on Akismet’s home page, you’ll see that as of tonight (June 13), Akismet has some pretty impressive statistics:

  • 67,664,249 spams caught so far
  • 135,846 so far today
  • 93% of all comments are spam

It’s getting to the point that, as good as WordPress is already, Akismet is one of the key reasons why anyone who blogs should use it. It’s almost never wrong … because as everyone uses it, the “wisdom of masses” means that it’s very, very intelligent about what is spam and what isn’t.

[tags] akismet, comment spam, splogs, spam, matt wullenberg, wordpress, john koetsier [/tags]

Gatorade: catch the cluetrain

Did you hear about the MIT students who built a raft out of Gatorade bottles and paddled it across the Charles river in Boston?

Jonathan, one of the students who built the raft, has been trying to get Gatorade’s attention, and finally succeeded. Here’s the response from the marketing people at Gatorade:

Jonathan: It sounds like you and your roommate are very ingenious. Making a raft out of Gatorade bottles and rowing it across the Charles River is certainly an accomplishment. Although we would not be able to use your pictures we would certainly love to see your work. You can send them to this email address as an attachment. Also, please respond with your complete mailing address sot that we can send both you and your roommate some coupons via US Mail.

Maybe it doesn’t matter so much when you sell $2 billion worth of your product yearly and can pay Michael Jordan $10 million to pump up your image. But companies would kill to get this kind of real-world exposure and attention.

I mean, the kids even have charts of their yearly Gatorade consumption, and Jonathan proclaims:

I’m the winner of Gatorade consumption!! I’m the one on the right. 47.8 gallons baby!
This totally crushes my last year’s grand total of 13 gallons, lol.

In a time when half of all young people online are writing their own stories, publishing their own photos, and contributing to the diversity and richness of web culture … and in the post-Cluetrain years … I’m going to suggest an ad based on this type of fan (fanatic) actions would be better than another generic celebrity endorsement.

I don’t care what Michael Jordan drinks: I know he’s been paid millions to have the right opinions and say the right things. But I am interested in what some ordinary everyday but funky/cool/ingenious college nerds with ideas do.

It’s different. It’s unboring. It’s real. It’s remarkable. It deserves something more than a couple of coupons in the mail.

I wonder if someone at Gatorade is smart enough to clue into that?

[tags] gatorade, cluetrain, marketing, MIT, charles river, john koetsier [/tags]

Ideavirus penicillin

I’ve been following Seth Godin’s blog lately.

He’s the extremely clueful author of Ideavirus, among other books.

So in a recent post on cargo-cult marketing I found it pleasantly surprising that he states “we have no idea why some ideas spread and others don’t.”

The post is about copying things you see successful companies doing, just like Pacific Islander cargo cults blindly copied US Army procedures like making an airstrip, creating a air traffic control hut, etc. The problem?

… just because you copy the elements that apparently made something work before doesn’t mean that you’re going to be guaranteed that it will work again.

Good point.

More interesting, though, is his admission that we just don’t know why some ideas spread and others don’t. I mean, he’s the expert.

We know something about how ideas spread, through Godin’s work, as well as Malcolm Gladwell’s The Tipping Point.

But why?

Some things catch. Some things don’t. Perhaps the best explanation is a Biblical one:

The race is not to the swift or the battle to the strong, nor does food come to the wise or wealth to the brilliant or favor to the learned; but time and chance happen to them all.

Which is not to say, as Damon Runyon observed, that you shouldn’t bet that way.

Just don’t expect to win every hand.

[tags] seth godin, ideavirus, marketing, innovation, ideas, malcolm gladwell, john koetsier [/tags]

Crowdsourcing, producerism, and consumers

Wired has an important article in their June issue on what they’ve dubbed crowdsourcing. What is crowdsourcing?

Remember outsourcing? Sending jobs to India and China is so 2003. The new pool of cheap labor: everyday people using their spare cycles to create content, solve problems, even do corporate R & D.

Jeff Howe, the author of Crowdsourcing, gives plenty of examples: it’s people uploading photos to iStockphoto where companies and people who need photos can buy them on the cheap. It’s VH1 sourcing videos that “ordinary” people have uploaded to the internet and building a show around them. It’s Proctor & Gamble finding underemployed brainiacs who solve thorny science and engineering problems at InnoCentive. And it’s Amazon’s Mechanical Turk … outsourcing fundamentally simple and repetitive problems that humans still do better than machines.

Other examples that Howe did not give but could have include the recent development of services that enable bloggers to sell their stories to mainstream media companies … newspapers, magazines, etc. … for a fraction of what a staff writer would cost. (For the life of me I cannot find that link back – help!) Or imagine excellent podcasts being paid for retransmission on satellite or terrestrial radio. I could see this happening with Venture Voice easily.

To me, this is incredibly relevant to the discussion on my recent We Are Not Consumers post. I wrote it in quasi-response to Pete Blackshaw’s Consumer-generated media blog … and Pete responded with a lengthy comment explaining why he still prefers the term “consumer.”

However, as the Wired article lists, 57% of 12- to 17-year-olds online are contributing to the web in one way or another:

Late last year the Pew Internet & American Life Project released a study revealing that 57 percent of 12- to 17-year-olds online – 12 million individuals – are creating content of some sort and posting it to the Web.

This is literally changing the world. However, if you’re a company that wants to take advantage of these new opportunities to get more work done cheaper, or to get work done that you’ve always wanted to do but could never do affordably, everything that is presented here relies on 4 things:

  1. Digitization
    All parts of the workflow must be digital. Ideally, not just in PDF form but in malleable formats: text is text, images are images, structure is structure. Everything is broken down to its component bits. 
  2. Dis-aggregation
    It must be possible to route any and every individual piece wherever it is needed to whomever is needed whenever needed. This allows you to break complex tasks down into simple component chunks, which reduces specialized knowledge needed for any individual job. 
  3. Re-aggregation
    After you’ve spread jobs all over the face of the earth, potentially, you need to be able to assemble all the bits and bytes back together. 
  4. Flexible smart project managers
    The entire process needs to be managed by smart flexible people who are open to new opportunities and able to adapt quickly to change.

ZDnet blogs: asking for your life history on the first date

I occasionally run across an interesting post on ZDNet blogs, and today I wanted to post a comment to one … until I saw the registration form.

Most blogs want just 3 pieces of information from you in order to post:

  1. your name
  2. your email address
  3. your website address, if you have one

That’s it. Finished. Now you can post your comment.

That’s fairly simple, and adds very little friction to contributing to a conversation on someone else’s blog.

However, on ZDNet blogs, there are 22 separate fields or pieces of information they ask you to fill out! Unsurprisingly, most of their blogs generate only a few comments.

I understand ZDNet wants to enhance their relationship with readers (and possibly generate more revenue per visitor) but this is insane. In case anyone’s listening at ZDNet, here’s a good way to enhance my relationship with you:

Make it easy for me to begin a relationship.

Here’s ZDNet’s sign-up form:

[tags] ZDNet, blogs, comments, conversations, signups, friction [/tags]

We are NOT consumers

I happened to notice a fairly informative blog today: Consumer-generated Media, by Pete Blackshaw.

The posts are on precisely what you’d expect: the read/write web, pinko marketing, and so on. But I have one beef with the site, and that’s the word “consumer” in the title.

The blog’s subtitle is “Did you get the memo? The consumer is in control!”

My question to Blackshaw is: didn’t you get the memo? It’s been right there in the Cluetrain Manifesto for years now.

Straight from the Cluetrain website:

If you only have time for one clue this year, this is the one to get …

We are not seats or eyeballs or end users or consumers.

We are human beings, and our reach exceeds your grasp.

Deal with it.

As I mentioned recently, Doc Searls has coined a new term: producerism. I like it. I like it a lot.

I’ve always hated the term “consumer.” How denigrating to be referred to only as some entity with an enormous mouth, eating mass-produced, mass-marketed products 24/7. We’re moving beyond that. People are rediscovering their innate urge to create, to produce, to share.

“Consumer” is a recent term, historically speaking. I’m struggling to remember my university Communications courses, but I believe it originated almost simultaneously with modern mass media (radio, TV) and mass marketing. Before then, people were citizens. or workers. Or producers. Anything but “consumers.”

I think it’s about time we sent that term back to the trash can of history.

Technorati rank improving, slowly

Fourteen days ago I posted on my Technorati rank, which was shattered by my move from gilgamesh.ca to Sparkplug9.com.

My gilgamesh.ca ranking was in the 90,000s, and is still higher than my other blogs: 115,668 (63 links from 24 sites). I tore that site apart and split the content between three focused blogs.

Two weeks ago, my rankings were as follows:

  1. bizhack was at 524,889 (10 links from 5 sites)
  2. art & artifice was at 612,109 (7 links from 4 sites)
  3. and my low-volume fish crackers was at 1,197,613 (0 links from 0 sites)

This week, things have changed just a little for the better:

  1. bizhack is now at 362,935 (17 links from 8 sites)
  2. art & artifice is now at 614,866 (14 links from 4 sites)
  3. and my low-volume fish crackers has cracked the million mark, at 910,472 (1 link from 1 sites)

There are still more links to my gilgamesh.ca address than to my three new blogs put together, but I guess that’s to be expected. After all, I had that address for about two years of consistent blogging.

Sparkplug9.com, on the other hand, and the three blogs I’ve now got set up here, are only perhaps a month old.

I’ll need lots of link love to make it back under 6 figures!

[tags] technorati, blog rank, popularity, links, blogroll [/tags]

Brand of YOU

Mike Wagner at Own Your Brand has an interesting post on branding.

He’s got five points of branding:

  • Difference: Tell me what makes your business or organization different.
  • Invitation: Passionately invite clients to purchase your offerings or members to join your organization.
  • Relevance: Your clients should be saying, “These people understand me. They get it!”
  • Truthfulness: Organizationally tell each other the truth, hear the truth from your customers, and act on that truth.
  • Yours: Insist (and I do mean INSIST) everyone in your organization “drinks your Kool-Aid.”

The post is mostly about Whirlpool: the company itself, and what it’s doing with its brand.

But when reading it, I actually thought he was going to develop the idea of each individual person as their own brand – within their sphere of influence: colleagues, clients, partners, friends, family, and acquaintances.

So I’m going to adapt his points for each individual person. For you. For me.

  • Difference: Why are you different than 50 million other people (in your own country, and around the world)?
  • Invitation: Be generous: give all acquaintances opportunities to benefit from your unique gifts and perspective.
  • Relevance: Listen – sincerely – much more than you talk. Then only say things that are relevant to the person/people you are with.
  • Truthfulness: Fooling yourself is a temporary luxury you cannot afford. Seek honest feedback continuously, and respond to it with real, visible change.
  • Yours: Always, always, always ensure that you get proper credit for your work – without being or seeming pushy, arrogant, or needy.

One thing to keep in mind: a brand is much more about who you are than about how you want to be perceived. Inner reality always surfaces eventually.

So none of the above will work over time unless you become who you want to be.

[tags] brand, brand of you, branding, marketing [/tags]

Web 2.0 Myth & Reality

Om Malik posted an article about web 2.0: it’s not about the mainstream, it’s going to hit big business, it doesn’t matter nearly as much as we think it does.

I posted a long comment on his blog, then (modestly) thought it was too good to not post here as well.

Without further ado …

Clearly, history is just one bloody thing after another, and mostly the same things in the same sequence.

“Web 2.0 is hot!”
“Web 2.0 is the Next. Big. Thing.™”
“Web 2.0 is going to take over the world!”
“Web 2.0 is over-hyped.”
“Web 2.0 is nothing but warmed-over old technologies.”
“Web 2.0 is the same old big companies doing big things for big clients.”

Ummm … haven’t we heard this already? Haven’t we been here before? Isn’t this exactly the cycle we went through with the internet, errr, web 1.0 boom a few years ago?

Here’s the simple problem:

Everyone over-estimates change in the short term and under-estimates change in the long term.

So we’re all jazzed about the New New Thing™ every couple of years, then deeply disappointed six months into the New New Thing™ when, sadly, it hasn’t solved world peace, provided food for all the hungry, and made Michael Jackson’s face look normal.

Time, my friends, heals all.

Web 2.0 is simply an extension, growth, enhancing of the people-first, user-centric, democratizing internet that we all went to the prom with a decade ago.

It is cool, it is different in degree, it is creating new business models, it is allowing small smart start-ups to compete, and it is not just for big business (as if that’s the standard by which all important technology is judged anyways).

But it’s not a silver bullet, it won’t let us get to the moon overnight, it won’t make more than 50 or 60 people “overnight” millionaires, and it won’t render the internal combustion engine obsolete.

It’s an opportunity … and opportunities, as you know, often come very well-disguised as hard work.

So let’s not expect instant miracles: let’s roll up our sleeves, use the new tools, and make some cool stuff.

[tags] web 2.0, malik, business, technology [/tags]

Climbing back up the Technorati ratings

How do you move your domain … and then get your Technorati blog rating back where it belongs?

I used to blog at gilgamesh.ca. That was my domain for over two years, until I realized that I was building a brand and a site that had nothing to do with me, or with my consulting business, Sparkplug 9.

Plus, I wanted to blog on a wide variety of topics. But I didn’t want to bother people who came to read an article on using iPods as e-learning tools with my a podcast with my son on his favorite games.

So I blew up my blog.

And gilgamesh.ca became:

But here’s the problem. After two years of postings, my gilgamesh.ca blog had cracked 5 digits at Technorati.

It wasn’t A-list material … probably not even C-list. But in the 90-something thousandth popularity spot, I was in the top .5% of blogs. And that was fairly cool … and a good base to build on.

But now I’ve moved domains. And moved my posts. And my popularity plunged … because few people have yet had a chance to link to my blogs.

Old rank:
A month after the switch, my gilgamesh.ca ranking is still higher than my other blogs: 109,845, with 65 links from 25 sites.

New rank:
My new rankings are MUCH lower:

  1. bizhack is my top blog right now, at 524,889 (10 links from 5 sites)
  2. art & artifice is not far behind, at 612,109 (7 links from 4 sites)
  3. and my low-volume fish crackers is lost in the dust, at 1,197,613 (0 links from 0 sites)

Mind you, this is after a fairly intense effort to find all the people who linked to gilgamesh.ca and, via making comments on their blogs, asking them to update their links. Unfortunately, most have not. In some cases, this might be due to dead blogs. In most cases, blog authors simply don’t check all their comments – probably worn out by comment spam.

And, of course, I’ve put a fairly intelligent 301 Redirect on the gilgamesh.ca domain, so that people coming in for an article on an old link will, in most cases, get seamlessly redirected to the right location.

What else is there to do?

Other than the things I have done, I guess all that I can do is post great articles that people want to link to. And, of course, intellingently comment on other people’s related blogs in a continuing effort to get the word out.

Anything else? Let me know!

. . .
. . .

[tags] technorati, ranking, SEO, A-list, B-list, C-list, john koetsier [/tags]

World Beat Canada

Last Sunday Teresa and I had dinner with her family … including her uncle Cal Koat, who is the creative spark behind Worldbeat Canada, “Canada’s home for contemporary global music.”

Cal does a weekly radio show on Vancouver radio station CJVB, does the Celt in a Twist top 10 list of Celtic music, and interviews world musicians for radio and podcasts.

Well worth a visit, if only for the great pic on the first page of the site!

The Information-Age Mindset

A colleaugue forwarded me a PDF of the Information-Age Mindset, by Jason Frand. It’s a couple of years old now, but still very relevant.

Frand’s key points:

  1. Computers aren’t technology anymore
    Technology is only what’s been invented since you were a kid (Alan Kay). For most young people, that means computers aren’t technology … they’re part of the furniture.
  2. Internet is better than TV
    TV-viewing is down, slightly, for the first time in decades. Why? The internet. (The way I think of this myself is: which could I do without? The answer is not TV!)
  3. Reality isn’t real
    A picture is no longer proof. Reality is sometimes virtual. Everything can be manipulated.
  4. What you do, not what you know
    Now, we’re always learning. So the ability to learn is much more important than a static body of acquired knowledge.
  5. Nintendo over logic
    Young people just try stuff (like new software). People without an information-age mindset try to read the manual before jumping in.
  6. Typing rather than handwriting
    My hand hurts these days when I have to write anything of any length at all.
  7. Staying connected
    People expect to be connected all the time, everywhere.
  8. Zero tolerance for delay
    If I can can info on the net immediately, why should I have to wait for anything?
  9. Consumer/creator blurring
    Frand caught this trend early … now with “web 2.0” it’s obvious to everyone who’s looking.

[tags] information, technology, mindset, kids [/tags]

WordPress versus WordPress

I set up this tester account at WordPress.com months and months ago, when I was still running off the gilgamesh.ca domain.

I’m wondering if most of the development on WordPress (the blogging platform) is now happening on improvements for WordPress (the blog hosting platform). So I went back today and updated some of the links, added a first article, and so on.

It’s hard to say, but what I think is probably happening is that Matt & Co actually are focusing on WordPress.com, but not to give it more features than WordPress the blogging software. Rather, they seem to be trying to get it to feature parity: multiple themes, using your own domain, and so on …

Although, in a couple areas, they’re ahead of a default WordPress install on your own server. Blog stats and feed stats are nice touches that, of course, because it’s on their servers, they can offer.

Overall, WordPress.com is not bad … if it had been where it is now 6 months ago, I’m not sure I’d have needed to move my server to Media Temple, or have needed a server host at all.

On the other hand, there’s a lot to be said for having your own space – and for having someone taking your money and therefore being accountable for the quality of your site’s hosting (and uptime!)

One thing’s for sure: my site definitely loads quicker.

I really wonder how WordPress.com is going to make money. Will they put Adsense on all accounts? Or start charging a minimal fee?

After all, they’re not Google – I doubt they can keep doing it for free.

A pox on all domain squatters

I’m starting to wonder if there shouldn’t be some kind of use-it-or-lose it rule on domain names.

Before I consolidated my blogs onto the Sparkplug 9 domain, and moved off my old gilgamesh.ca domain, I looked hard at the alternatives.

Something that had some kind of connection to my name would have been nice. So I started going through all the combinations:

And so on … until I had racked up a list of probably 10 or more domain names that would have made sense given my name – most of which were not actually being used for any particular website at all. Just parked, with ads on them, pop-unders for the unwary, and offers for online gambling, etc.

Not cool.

Apparently there’s gold in squatting on domain names. I just wonder if allowing that business is worth the inconvenience any company or individual has to go through these days to get a website.

Because so many domain names are taken by squatters, legit sites looking for a home on the web end up with names like Ookles and 37blah, 92whatevers, and 4somethings. Or orange monkey (OK, I made that one up).

Of course, from such hassles we also get wonderful constructions like del.icio.us, and histori.ca.

Free web 2.0 business idea

OK.

You want to be cool. You want to be an entrepreneur. And you want to start a shiny new web 2.0 company. Here’s an idea for you:

You 2.0. Or myspy.

I can’t decide which name I like better. But here’s the idea in four words: persistent painless personal history.

Got that?

The idea’s free. If you do it, let me know. I’d love to help in any way I can. But I’m not doing it myself, for a perfectly valid reason that might stop you too.

Here’s the idea
The business is simple: build a Firefox plugin and an Internet Explorer toolbar that do nothing but report what websites you’re visiting to a server. That builds a list of sites that you’ve visited.

That’s basically it. A few details:

  • You can go back to see the sites you’ve visited in the past
  • Others can see what sites you’ve been to
  • You can display the sites you’ve visited as a feed to your blog
  • You can search your visited sites
  • You can search all the sites that people have visited
  • You can see popular sites displayed on the home page

Over time, you build in more cool features by spidering and auto-tagging pages that people are visiting, and building pretty (but oh-so-useful) tag clouds on users’ home pages.

Pretty cool, huh? Neat for an individual, and cool because a community could develop around it. As digital becomes a huge part of our identities (Flickr, blogs, MySpace, etc.), wouldn’t you want painless personal history?

There’s only that one problem I mentioned earlier. Actually, there’s two:

1: Filthy lucre, or lack thereof
I can’t figure out how to monetize it. And without monetizing it, it would just be a cool project that, if it got popular, would bog down under its own weight of server and bandwidth costs.

In other words, I’m not convinced AdSense would cover the bills.

2: Competitors
There are three or four potential competitors that could totally and completely kill it:

  • Alexa
  • Mozilla
  • Google
  • Microsoft

All four of these already have or very easily could have toolbars that install and essentially phone home on every click. That done, the rest is easy. And for Alexa and/or Google, it would be right up their alley.

Tempting
Still, it’s tempting. You 2.0. Myspy. Persistent painless personal history. Inherently social.

Spyware where the spy-er and the spy-ee are the same person.

I like it!

Full disclosure: I ran this idea past Guy Kawasaki, and while he thought it was cool too … also did not see a viable business model. He’s a pretty clueful guy. But if you decide to prove us wrong and try to make it work: go for it!

Refreshing honesty: the best thing about blogging

John Gruber at Daring Fireball is taking the plunge: testing out the blogging-is-my-job waters. As I was reading about that, I happened to click on his colophon, to read these delightful words:

If Daring Fireball looks like shit in your browser, you’re using a shitty browser that doesn’t support web standards. Netscape 4 and Internet Explorer 5, I’m looking in your direction. If you complain about this, I will laugh at you, because I do not care.

Love ’em or hate ’em, the point is that they’re real.

Most businesses and marketers could learn a lot from this type of plainspoken openness. Yes, you’ll lose customers. But you’ll also gain some.

And how is being vanilla working for you right now?

Marketing to kids & teens: YouTube

I’ve just started on a marketing project that will be aimed at kids/teens.

I don’t like the word marketing … let’s put it this way: I want to create some really cool stuff that people (young people) will be interested enough about that they’ll want to talk about, share, and, yes, buy. Both online and off. Marketing in the Pinko Marketing sense.

(Sorry for the vagueness of “stuff,” but it’s too early to chat about it yet.)

So, in the interests of understanding teens, I went to YouTube a couple nights ago and spent some time clicking through videos. Found this “hot” one:

Subscribe to my Substack