Tag - blogging

Odeo is incredible

OK, “Odeo is incredible” is a fairly giddy title. But frankly, that’s the way I feel.

I’ve been using and building web technology for over a decade … but Odeo blows me away.

It’s the best of what’s sometimes referred to as web 2.0: simple, beautiful, social, searchage, taggable, mashable software. (Mashable in at least the very weak sense that I can import it right into my blog with one line of code, and possibly in more involved ways that I’m not aware of.)

In the past 2 years, I have never had any real interest in creating podcasts. I did it for a client that used podcasts to teach English-as-a-second-language students, but it was not a passion of mine by any stretch of the imagination.

But Odeo caught my eye recently and I’ve been using it – more for fun than anything else.

The kids and I made a “happy birthday” podcast for their grandfather – over on my personal & family blog: Art & artifice. Aidan, my youngest son, and I had some fun the other night.

It’s just so easy and instant. Two minutes, and you’ve got a podcast. Add one or two to post it on your blog, if you wish. It’s literally child’s play.

Incredible!

WordPress importing into WordPress

I’m wondering why WordPress can import blog entries from:

  • Blogger
  • Dotclear
  • LiveJournal
  • Movable Type
  • RSS
  • Textpattern

but not from a WordPress blog ….

Maybe it’s just me, but this seems odd, seriously odd. I mean, all the import options (except RSS) will ask you for some configuration information, go out and grab all your articles, suck them down, and insert them into your WordPress database.

Why not do it for a WordPress blog too?

It’d be extremely helpful when bloggers are trying to move a site from one hosting provider to another. Because even when migrating to another box, another system, another company is easy, it’s not easy. And when it’s not easy, it’s bloody-mindedly difficult.

(RSS is an option in the list above, but it’s not a viable option, as most RSS feeds don’t have all the posts from a blog in them, just the last 10 or so.)

Site back up; was offline almost all day

Today was fun. The site was down almost all day after a database meltdown.

Fortunately, all seems to be well now (10:30 PM) after a few hours of nail-biting. The most recent backup I had was about a week to 10 days old, so I wasn’t looking forward to having to re-create everything.

Naturally, the first thing I did after getting back up was make an immediate backup – now I feel a LOT better.

Hopefully things go better from now on … I may have to switch hosting providers, however.

Blogging? Apple listens!

A couple of months ago I blogged about a way to crash Apple’s Mail reliably.

In about an hour, I had an email from an Apple employee. Dan Nolen said:

Hi,

I saw your blog post on crashing Mail reliably:

http://www.sparkplug9.com/index.php/2006/02/14/crash-os-xs-mail-reliably/

If you like, I’d be happy to review the crash log for Mail to see if I can spot the cause or at least make sure it’s logged in Apple’s tracking system.

The file is on your hard drive at:
~/Library/Logs/CrashReporter/Mail.crash.log

This is a text file that you can inspect. It contains your OS version and computer name, but no other personally identifiable information.

Looking forward to your response,

Unfortunately, though I corresponded with him a bit and gave him a few things, I was insanely busy at the time, and just about to leave on a couple of trips. So I didn’t help him out as much as I would have liked.

But a couple of days ago, I got an email from a Justin Garcia at Apple. While Dan was a quality control guy, I have the feeling that Justin is a developer on the Mail team. He went right to the point:

Can you still reproduce the crash described at:
http://www.sparkplug9.com/index.php/2006/02/14/crash-os-xs-mail-reliably/

If so, could you post your signature file? It’s in ~/Users/Library/Signatures/
Thanks

I sent him the sig file, and emailed Dan to let him know what was up. He replied that they seem to already be on the case. Hopefully we’ll see a fix in the next Mac OS update.

OK. I’ll attempt to consolidate efforts with him. I did file a bug on your behalf which was marked a duplicate of something we’re already investigating. I’ve asked Justin if he’s filed a bug too.

In terms of just this issue, it’s a fairly minor problem with Mail, and a fairly inconsequential exchange of emails.

But in the larger context of Apple engineers and employees working with actual customers, it’s very encouraging. This is how to work with the blogosphere!

Way to go, Apple! (Especially Dan and Justin!)

Apple: do no evil

Apple, it’s time to call off the legal dogs.

Jason O’Grady, the long-term publisher behind PowerPage, is being sued by Apple.

Would you ever want to be on the business end of legal action from a company with US$9 billion in cash? What about being targeted for deletion by one of most powerful multi-national corporations in the world? What if a company with US$14 billion in revenue and 14,000 employees wanted a piece of your ass?

Welcome to my world.

This is stupid, and not just because the story that O’Grady originally posted is about some dinky little Garageband add-on.

  • It’s stupid because Apple is suing someone who loves and supports Apple.
  • It’s stupid because Apple is hurting itself by suing O’Grady by getting tons of bad press.
  • It’s stupid because in the US, the first amendment right to free speech is fairly clear.
  • It’s stupid because Apple’s love of secrecy, blended with small leaks that tell part of the story, is the perfect guerrilla marketing mix.
  • It’s stupid because, even if you’re Steve Jobs, you can’t control the whole world or make every person do exactly what you want him or her to do.
  • It’s stupid because controlling all information at all times is impossible, or at least impractical.

Apple: stop this. It’s wrong, and almost everyone at Apple should know it. Call off the lawyers.

There’s a much newer company just up the road from you that has a fairly idealistic slogan: Do No Evil. Apple’s never explicitly adopted anything like it, but the community of Mac lovers and users has always felt that the people at Apple were “the good guys.”

Don’t let a little success get to your heads. More importantly, don’t let a little success get to your hearts.

Update:
John Welch at bynkii.com is solidly on Apple’s side in this discussion. I wonder if he’d feel differently if he was getting sued?

Goodbye Zoomclouds I hardly knew you

Astute observers of sparkplug9.com will have noticed that Zoomclouds, announced with such frisson merely a week ago, is toast.

Zoomclouds offers a very simple way to add tag clouds to blogs. Since, of course, no self-respecting hip web 2-ish blogger would be caught in a coffee-bar without a tag cloud, I had to have one too. Keeping up with the Joneses, you know.

However, Zoomclouds (among its other lamentable failings) had two fatal flaws:

  1. it only indexed a tiny fraction of my content
  2. it thought everything was a tag, including sea gull

Yes, sea gull. Not cool. Not cool at all. Not even slightly hip. Rather Fisherman’s Friend gauche, actually. So Zoomclouds had to go.

Luckily, my fragile sense of blogging panache was bolstered by the concurrent sighting of Zak Greant’s Category Cloud. Instant image restoration!

Category Cloud, unfortunately, is not a final solution. Sadly, it’s a chimera: the tags it displays are not tags at all, but simply – as the name suggests – categories masquerading as tags.

Which means it works great for bloggers like me, who have hundreds of hideously old-fashioned un-tagged posts. A better solution will have to wait until WordPress supports tagging and tag clouds natively.

Until that day: long live categories! (And category clouds.)

Business blogging: it’s not what you do, it’s who you become

I’ve been thinking about business blogging lately.

Partly because of a months-old post on Hugh McLeod’s blog about what comes after the Cluetrain, and a post he references on Marketing Hub.

But mostly because of a need in my present business venture to spend more time listening to real people in real jobs in real organizations that we think will buy/use/promote the products and services we’re creating.

Here’s the key piece from the Marketing Hub post:

“The value may not be the immediate impact of their [bloggers’] words on the market, but how the conversation changes the blogger. As Hugh says, it may be a mistake to focus on using blogs to sell things; it’s more about creating real engagement – where you are changed too. And the thing about good conversations is that more goes on than just an exchange of information. Something more energising takes place. I think that’s the deeper insight of the whole ‘markets are conversations’ meme.”

In other words, business blogging is not something you do, it’s something you are.

It’s not operational but ontological.

It’s not economical but epistemological.

And in the end, business blogging is not something you are, it’s something you become.

The traditional company is an organization defined by barriers. These people are in; these people are out. Employees know certain things; customers know other things; non-clients know other things: all separate domains of knowledge.

(And sometimes keeping those domains of knowledge separate is facilitated, even encouraged.)

Blogging is just one thing that can turn this beast inside out … making the surface area outside greater than the surface area inside. The more surface, the more touch. The more touch, the more influence.

And the more you touch, the more you are influenced.

Barriers are defined by what they keep out – and what they keep in. Business blogging is one way of turning an impermeable barrier into a permeable barrier – if a barrier at all.

What kind of company would result?

Perhaps one that ‘gets it.’ Perhaps one that is (not just understands) its market. Perhaps even one that doubles its sales.

New tag cloud: powered by Zoomclouds

You may have noticed the snazzy new tag cloud adorning the right-hand side of this page.

(I’m trying to be trendy and web 2-ish, and possibly get acquired by Google or Yahoo for mad money.)

I noticed the Zoomclouds link at Guy Kawasaki’s blog – he just got a new tag cloud as well. I thought I’d give it a shot.

The good
First off, it’s dead simple. Give Zoomclouds your RSS feed, configure a few settings (or not), and paste some code into your source. Done. It’d be hard to make it simpler.

It’s also nicely configurable – and so I was able to get the colors to match up to my site colors very easily. (And if you know a little HTML and Javascript, you can customize it a little beyond the defaults.)

The not-so-good
It’s not a huge deal, but I don’t like the big Zoomclouds logo on my site. I’ll live with it to get the tag cloud, but I think that since you go to Zoomclouds’ site when you click a cloud item, and that Zoomclouds is putting Google Adwords on the results that you see there, that’s enough branding for them.

More importantly, the posts that feed the tag cloud only go back a few weeks in time. I’d like Zoomclouds to spider my site and present a tag cloud that reflects all the things I’ve written – not just the stuff since I added the cloud.

The kind of ugly
This is a mixed blessing/curse: tag selection. Zoomclouds is easy, so you don’t have to manually tag all your content. Excellent – I’m too lazy to go and tag all my previous 700 or so posts, even though I’d do it for stuff going forward.

However, this means that Zoomclouds makes a somewhat-arbitrary determination, based on parsing through your RSS feed, on what is a tag or not. This works, sometimes. Maybe even most of the time.

But it does mean that I have a tag on my site labeled poor bird. Umm … it’s unlikely I’d ever create a tag like that if I were doing it myself.

Hopefully, however, Zoomclouds incorporates some social intelligence into what should be a tag or not, based on all the sites using its service, and will get better over time.

(Looks like they’re working on this issue already.)

Suggestions

  1. Zoomclouds should understand categories, and automatically accept them as tags (at least for the major blogging platforms).
  2. Zoomclouds should allow for some form of manual tagging, if only as an option for geeks.
  3. A ping service would be wonderful, so that you could just add Zoomclouds to the list of pings your blogging software sends out automatically for each post. Knowing that you’ve added content recently, Zoomclouds could then refresh your tag cloud based on the update.
  4. A force update feature would be nice – something that you could click and force Zoomcloud to refresh its cache of your content and the tag cloud that it has created for you. (I’ve mentioned this one in a comment on Zoomcloud’s site.)
  5. And, as mentioned, it’d be great if Zoomclouds spidered my blog and made the cloud relevant for all my posts, not just the past few.

Overall
The results are good enough right now that I’ll stick with the service for a bit, and see how it goes. I like the look of the tag cloud, and I like that way of organizing and navigating information, and I’m hoping the service will improve over time in the areas where it might be a little wanting.

OK, Technorati officially sucks again

Don’t get me wrong – I love Technorati. They’re bringing out all kinds of new features – seeing other’s favorite blogs is neat – and generally have a great, useful site.

There’s only one problem: search unavailability.

I wrote about it back in August of ’05. It’s actually been a lot better since then.

But a couple of weeks ago I started noticing searches coming back with the infamous “high volume of searches” busy message.

A great service that isn’t connected isn’t a great service.

In pursuit of blogging simplicity …

As I mentioned recently, I’ve been looking for ways to simplify this site.

It’s a truism, but more is not always more.

And I was really starting to feel that more was less. So I’ve been getting rid of stuff:

  • time of posting
  • related posts
  • Google AdWords
  • Chitika MiniMalls
  • all the “add to Google,” “add to feedburner,” “add to My Yahoo,” etc. links
  • categories that stories are posted in
  • specific, labeled permalinks

And that’s just the beginning. What else can I lose … and in the process gain?

I’ll be looking for more!

Blogs and white space: never the twain shall meet?

I’ve recently been considering re-doing my blog skin, and wondering about all the pieces, chunks, and components of a modern, integrated blog.

There’s a ton, at least on my site. At least 13:

  • header with “station identification:” name and so on
  • introduction to the site and author
  • list of categories
  • list of recent posts
  • RSS paraphernalia
  • archives
  • list of my recent del.icio.us bookmarks
  • credits
  • links, blogroll
  • Feedblitz email subscription
  • a footer link to previous posts
  • Google AdWords
  • Chitika Minimall

Oh, and by the way, there’s a bunch of posts, too. (Kind of the main reason for the site, huh?)

I’m looking at this and wondering: why have I added so much stuff? Isn’t this the opposite of simple? What are really the essential components?

Flickr blog
And somewhere today I saw a link to the Flickr blog. Whoa – whitespace galore.

The Flickr blog has about 4 elements:

  • – header and “station identification”
  • – intro to the Flickr blog
  • – RSS
  • – Archives
  • – some info about Flickr itself

That it. Nothing more. Not a footer. Not a recent articles listing. No ads. No links. No categories. Clean. Simple. Refreshing.

Now comes the hard part: what am I willing to part with?

. . .
. . .

(Note: My posts themselves also have a ton more information (clutter) than the Flickr blog. How much is neccessary? How much is worthwhile? How much could I increase the signal-to-noise ratio by simplifying? Tough questions!)

Commonalities in good web design

I’m currently thinking of redoing my blog design, and just started another, Fish Crackers.

And I want it to be usable and cool and web 2ish and wonderful and aesthetically impressive, of course.

Here’s a great start for seeing what kind of design is hot right now. But not just hot – also good. Even great.

Here are the key factors:

– Simple layout
– 3D effects, used sparingly
– Soft, neutral background colours
– Strong colour, used sparingly
– Cute icons, used sparingly
– Plenty of whitespace
– Nice big text

The first, I think, is one of the hardest.

New blog: Fish Crackers

Fine. I admit it. I’ve finally gone and done it – started a new blog.

On this blog, I haven’t hid that I’m a Christian. Quite the opposite.

But it hasn’t been quite the right place to develop a number of projects that I’m feeling called to work on. One, for instance, is a “translation” of the Biblical book of Romans into modern language that’s easy for average people to read and understand.

So I’ve started Fish Crackers. Fish, as you know, have been a symbol of Christianity ever since the first century. And crackers are little bits of food that are portable.

My hope is that I will be spiritually fed as I contribute to this new blog … and maybe even a few others might as well.

Drupal versus WordPress: not a contest

I’m looking for a way to manage several blogs at once, so I’ve been investigating Drupal just a little.

I wouldn’t need to manage the blogs within Drupal, although that could be done, but I would like to aggregate their posts on one page, which would then become my home online.

Since my web host has a control panel thingamabob that can automatically install about a million different content management systems, stores, scripts, you name it, at the touch of a button, checking out Drupal was easy.

I only have first impressions to report, but I have to say my first impressions are not very impressive.

Drupal is light-years behind WordPress in terms of site administration and management.

Maybe the problem is that WordPress is just too easy, but I find Drupal disorganized, piecemeal, and confusing. By contrast, WordPress is clear, direct, and vastly more elegant:

wordpress-control-panel.jpg

My perception is that Drupal is powerful, and can do many things, but the reality I encountered is that even changing elements on a theme is 2 or 3 times harder than in WordPress. Understanding which modules are activated, and when their permissions are correct, and ensuring they show in a particular place on a particular page is a challenge.

I’m glad for the brief glimpse, but unless I see or hear something fairly different fairly quickly, Drupal will not be in my future web plans.

Vancouver 2.0 Blogger Interview series

Vancouver Web 2.0 forum has started a weekly blogger interview series … all featuring bloggers from Vancouver, of course.

This week, they’re featuring Jeffery Simpson, who writes at a variety of personal and multi-author blogs. Jeffery needs a new pic for his site and should apparently never venture into another elevator ever again. (Well, at least not 10 minutes before a hot date.)

Why am I following the blogger interview series?

Well, first off I’m trying to be more aware of local bloggers here in Vancouver. And secondly (the selfish reason) I’m going to be interviewed 2nd or 3rd in the series. A very happy confluence of public and private interest, no?

WordPress 2.0: Image Uploading Broken

I use WordPress as my blogging software, and I recently upgraded to the new version 2.0.

The new version is excellent in most ways, wonderful for integrated comment spam blocking, it is driving me nuts with its silly image uploading problems.

I format my own images in Photoshop and (in the old version of WordPress) customized the image upload page’s handling so that it returned a bunch of HTML that incorporated image placement and bordering code.

Well, WP 2.0 has integrated image uploading right into the blog posting page. Good idea – it looks like this, right under the post entry form:

wp-image-uploading.png

The problem comes in after you upload a file. You get a little preview, and when you click on it, a list of options:

options.png

All well and good – until you actually start to use them.

Using thumbnail, if you leave it, would suggest that WP would stick a thumbnail image into your post, which would be clickable if someone wanted to see it full-size. Nice feature – if you want it.

When you deselect it, like this:

no-thumbnail.png

You would think that the result would be a full-size image dumped into your page when you, immediately thereafter, click “Send to editor.” But you’d be wrong.

Instead, WordPress just sends a thumbnail version to your post … so if you save and publish, you’ll get this wonderful result:

teeny-tiny-image.png

Not cool. Not cool at all. While you’ve just told your software to use the original, it’s disobeying you and, instead, displaying a thumbnail version.

In fact, it’s doing precisely opposite what you asked it to do.

Of course, it’s not actually creating a thumbnail. That would require actually editing the image and rely on a variety of other software being installed on your server. Instead, WordPress is simply setting the height and width properties in the HTML to some fraction of the actual image height and width.

So it’s

1) disobeying your direct instructions
2) not saving you any bandwidth at all
3) making your blog look awful, or
4) forcing you to do more work to get it right

WordPress development people, Matt, whoever: please fix this!

. . .
. . .

Of course, a variety of people around the web have already found this out … and there’s a discussion about it on the WordPress support forums, as well as here, and Techcrunch has a few notes on it as well. Also see this post of a set of general gotchas with WordPress 2.0.

[ update Jan. 13 ]

I’ve hacked WordPress’s file inline-uploading.php to do what I want. I want it to upload files, to stick them in the editor, and not do any resizing.

(Oh, and btw, I want it to automatically center them, and apply my pic CSS styling to them, which gives them a little grey border. But that’s incidental.)

To accomplish what I did, grab a copy of inline-uploading.php out of the wp-admin directory. After making a backup copy, delete lines 236-247, and replace with this code:

(Then, if you wish, just strip out my custom additions. They are the “div align = center”, the closing div tag, and the “class = pic” chunk.)

C’ing My A
Use at your own risk, your mileage may vary, make a backup first, and note: this will kill the thumbnail generation …. which is exactly what I want it to do, but I’m not sure if that’s your desire as well!

Intrapreneur

Guy Kawasaki is good. I mean really, really, really good.

I started reading his blog almost as soon as he started writing it because … well, the Kawasaki chic, right? The ineffable aura of Apple coolness, even ex post facto. And the attractive seductiveness of a venture capitalist, one of those magical beings that bestow money on mere mortals.

Then, of course, my hard drive crashed, and I lost all my RSS feeds, bookmarks, etc., and I kind of forgot about Guy. (I sure hope he pronounces that as rhyming with bee, by the way. That’s the Only Right Way™.) That was a mistake.

He recently hit my radar screen again, just as I was starting a revisioning process in Premier home & family, my baby. And he’s not going to drop off it, this time.

Today I spent a chunk of time on his blog, and what really caught my eye this time was this article about intrapreneurship … being an entrepreneur within a large organization.

It’s not easy, you know. Those Aerons aren’t nearly as comfortable as they’re cracked up to be. (Umm … small joke. I only wish …)

Here’s his list of to-do’s for intrapreneurs:

  • kill the cash cows
  • reboot your brain
  • find a separate building
  • hire infected people
  • put the company first
  • stay under the radar
  • collect and share data
  • dismantle when done

Read his post for details – it’s worth your time.

The toughest one, of course, is killing the cash cows. This is the standard innovator’s dilemma: I’m making millions from buggy whips … how can I go to making thousands on automobile tires?

The reality is that somehow, most companies have to transition their mainline showcase products every decade or so as time and technology obsolete them. The hardest part is going from being the ultimately adapted lean mean king of your (diminishing but still very profitable) space to being just one of the contenders, not too well adapted, not lean, not mean, and probably not even as profitable – at least at first. The urge to protect is so strong and so (seemingly) natural that most companies never make it onto the next curve.

Intrapreneurship might just be the way for dinosaurs to evolve.

The alternative is Sony-fication. Walkman, anyone?

The Linguist Update

This is months out-of-date, but I figured I should mention that I’m no longer affiliated with The Linguist.

I did some work for Mark and Steve Kaufmann as a consultant, operating under my Sparkplug corporation.

But about 4 months ago, it just became too much: work, family, home, blog, and business. Plus, I’m working on my masters in Educational Technology at UBC. So I simply told Mark I was too busy, and finished out the month contract I was working on.

My name still appears in some places on the blog I created for The Linguist … but it looks like Mark has changed my account information and all the articles that I wrote are now “posted by Mark Kaufmann.” My guess is that this was simply to not confuse visitors to the site with the name of a person who no longer does any work for The Linguist. Still, it leads to some interesting combinations of post author and post body.

In any case, it was a lot of fun, and I wish Mark and Steve nothing but the best. They’re quality people, and The Linguist is a great way to learn English.

Blocking spam in WordPress is a royal PITA

I just upgraded my install of WordPress to 2.0, which is really, really, cool, and I’m typing this in the new, enhanced, updated, fantabulastic WYSIWYG web 2.0 buzzword-compliant text entry area, but there was one painful aspect to the upgrade.

One of the main reasons I upgraded is that WP 2.0 includes an Akismet plugin which will help eliminate the raft of comment spam that all bloggers have to deal with.

So what’s the problem?

Well, in order to activate the plugin, you have to have a WordPress API Key. And, in order to get one of those, you must, yes must, have a WordPress.com account. That’s a point that this FAQ seems to have missed.

WordPress.com is the multi-user version of WordPress … one install for thousands of bloggers. Sort of like blogger or typepad, but better. And free, I might add.

However, since I run my blog on my own server, I have no need of a WordPress.com account. However, since I need an WordPress API key to activate my Askismet anti-comment spam plug-in, WordPress.com now has a new (and never to be used) blog called Bleegers. With one (and just one) nonsense article on it.

Such, Matt, are the consequences of run-arounds. Unless I’m just missing something.

But I don’t think I am.

Corporate blogging how-to

Very good post on corporate blogging on Alan Gutierrez’ blog.

Here’s a key bit from the section I liked best:

Does your firm do anything that makes for good television? Anything that is steeped in technical lingo, particulars?

Give a blog to the team that crash tests your automobiles, or conducts the taste testing of your snack foods, or the people create and record the voices of your cartoon ducks. Set them up like English Cut, or the new Horse Bliss. Create a blog where your employees can regale readers with stories of the know-how and history that makes your firm special.

Client-developer-marketer: friend?

I’m leading a new business initiative for my company that has potential for huge and almost instant scale due to our massive installed base in education.

But only if we do it right.

And I’m wondering how/if we can do something like this: inviting our clients to be part of our product development department, marketing department: partners. The challenge that I’m facing is that we can only really do what we really are, and the reality is that we are a traditional company that makes stuff, markets stuff, and sells stuff.

We’re trying hard to bring customers into the product development loop, and that’s a good thing.

But my dream is to take that farther. Way farther.

The success of a Flickr, Delicious, Google Base, you name it, is that the company/service/product invites you to add to it, modify it, use it, adapt it. To make it yours.

Perhaps it’s the difference between making a platform and an application. An application is optimized for defined purposes. A platform is too, but to a much lesser degree. Rather, it’s optimized to enable all kinds of purposes, including, and perhaps especially, those that the developers haven’t even thought of yet.

Hence APIs. Hence customizable, flexible tools. Hence beta versions. Hence an adventurous, daring sense of what-the-heck, let’s try it.

That’s what I want. That would make our clients our developers. Our marketers. Our partners, in a sense.

But not in the sense that they would do our work for us, or that we would co-opt them, or somehow coerce their cooperation.

Rather, this would only happen if people in their own legitimate self-interest did things that benefited them however they wanted … and we provided tools, bases, platforms to enable that. But as individuals created value for themselves, they would contribute to the value of the ecosystem.

Which would build more value for them, more value for new clients, and more value for us.

OK. That’s the theory. Now … how to do that?

. . .
. . .

Hugh at gapingvoid gets this. The people behind the cluetrain get this. Can somewhat traditional companies get it?

Related posts (maybe)

I’ve added a feature to my blog – related posts. You can see it at the bottom of every post.

I’ve currently titled it Possibly related posts, because I’m a little unsure of how smart the technology is. So far, so good. Most things look at least somewhat related, and those that don’t are delightful windows (for me, at least) into past posts that I can happily discover.

A WordPress plugin is currently generating the related posts, which I found at some guy’s site. Here’s the precise link, if you’re interested.

Very good so far!

. . .
. . .

BTW, one of the best things about WordPress as a blogging platform is a fairly rich developer community … 714 plugins so far.

The ‘long tail’ is really, really long

I occasionally wander over to Technorati and weep at my woefully pitiful blog ranking: 103,499th.

Ouch.

But the other day, I had a slightly contrary thought. Sure, I’m part of the long tail of websites. Specifically, blogs.

But that long tail is really, really, really long. Incredibly long. In fact, mind-blowingly long. As Technorati now states, it is currently tracking 21.6 million blogs (as well as 1.7 billion links).

(BTW, since reducing the 22 million blogs by some considerably large fraction to take out the fake, auto-generated spam blogs would reduce the impact of my coming point, and since that would also adversely affect my ego, I’m going to ignore them.)

If I place slightly worse than 100,000th in a race, that sucks. However, if 22 million people are racing … maybe that’s not too bad after all.

In fact, with those numbers, sparkplug9.com is comfortably within the top 1% of all blogs. In fact, I’m in the top .5%.

Wow! Cool! Wooooooo! I came in 103,449th!

Can you believe some poor sucker is sitting at 103,450th right now? He (or she) must feel like a complete chump or something.

At least I’m not 103,451st. That would be a real embarrassment.

. . .
. . .

By the way …
Here’s a really, really good Wired article on the long tail. In fact, it’s the article that started the long tail meme.

Blog usability

I have been meaning to post on usability as it relates to blogs … I happened to see Jakob Neilsen’s article on blog usability the other day.

The funny thing is that from a day-to-day perspective, blogs (most of them) are about as usable as you can get … because all the content is spread right out there for you to see.

But Neilsen’s right: beyond the current content, it’s a hopeless mess of search and chronologically sorted postings. Categories help, but they’re time-sorted too … meaning that even in my slowest categories, finding old posts is a somewhat laborious process.

In any case, I hope to be spending some time on the usability of this website in the next little while.

Google Blog Search Goes Live

Am I the only one who’s noticed, or have I been living under a rock?

Google has started a blog search section. Whoa. Now we know why they didn’t buy Technorati … they thought they could do a better job themselves.

Interesting how it seems to find stories – it’s very time-sensitive – rather than locations. For instance, searching for gilgamesh brings up a variety of stories from my site, and recent ones too, but does not bring up sparkplug9.com, the home page.

There’s is, however, a “related blogs” thing at the top, where ads typically run on Google web searches, that is NOT paid sponsorship, at least not yet, but simply direct links to the home pages of blogs that Google thinks are mostly about what you’re searching for.

Very, very interesting … the blogosphere will probably become much more slicable, dicable, and searchable as a result!

I can’t believe that no-one else seems to seems to have noticed that Google Blog Search is live.

[ update ]

Well, I seem to have been scooped by half a month or so, by Boing Boing. Odd that I haven’t heard anything about it lately, though.

Blogosphere growing

Yes, yes, it’s expanding, increasing, growing so fast it’s exploding, but that’s not the subject of this post. Rastin Mehr is blogging, and that’s A Good Thing™.

Rastin is in the Technology Solutions department at Premier, which I used to lead, and he’s doing all kinds of cool stuff there and on his own.

He’s got at least 2 great sites, but just started blogging recently. Congrats, and looking forward to more, Rastin.