Tag - technology

Start-ups: the perils of launching early

There are good reasons for some start-ups to run in stealth mode for months or years of their early existence.

I was reminded of a few as I was reading Chris Maxcer’s review of Joost for the iPhone. Check out this gem, about the desktop version:

I had briefly used Joost’s client-side Mac video viewing application in its early days, back when Joost had very little content … then forgot about it.

The dilemma is harsh: you want to launch as early as possible to:

  • start the buzz machine
  • stake your claim to the space
  • tantalize current and potential investors
  • maybe, possibly, potentially, hopefully start to pull in some small amount of revenue
  • and, of course, reassure your mother that you have a real job, actually work, have prospects, and aren’t aimless, drifting, shiftless, and just too stubborn to admit it

But the problem is obvious: launching too soon can blow your buzz as users eat your dogfood and throw up … never to arrive at your dinner table again.

That’s exactly what happened to Chris. In this case, however, Joost is lucky enough (and, frankly, has enough market momentum) to warrant a second look – occasioned by the release of their app on a new platform: the iPhone.

The question is: have they learned their lesson? Apparently not, as Maxcer reports:

The 1,813 reviews on the Apple App Store seem to agree with me: Joost has lots of promise but it fails miserably. The average rating is two stars. Many users, though, noted that they were basically waiting for a non-buggy updated version from Joost.

Mine, mine, mine: new electric Mini

I feel like one of the seagulls in Pixar’s Finding Nemo. When they see lunch in the form of Nemo and his sidekick exposed on a dock, they all start shouting “mine, mine, mine, mine” and swoop in for a bite.

A colleague who knows I drive a Mini just sent me a link to the all-new electric Mini:

As I mentioned to him, I’ll take e-Mini 2.0 … with more seating, a bit less weight, and perhaps a bit more range. This one is only a 2-seater, and has a 150 mile range.

But it’s tempting, nevertheless …

Gas prices driving distance education growth?

Are high gas prices driving faster adoption of distance education?

Distance education has already been growing rapidly over the last few years. But some are now seeing an even quicker uptake … and connecting that fact to higher gas prices. From a recent story in the Chronicle of Higher Education:

“It’s getting to the point of either gas or class,” says Robbie K. Melton, associate vice chancellor for the Tennessee Board of Regents, where this summer the number of students taking online courses spiked 29 percent, in part because of the high cost of buying gas to drive to campus.

Oil prices have doubled in just one year, and the price at the pump is expected to double again by 2010. With inflation like that, a 60 kilometre round trip that resulted in a daily gas bill of $10 a year ago is $20 today, and could be $40 in a few years. That’s going to drive a lot of behavior change – even among those who’d prefer in-person education.

“I would prefer to actually go to school and be there to do it,” says Ms. LaBadie, a single mother working toward a degree in medical administration. “But it’s hard enough paying tuition, much less the price of gas.”

Fortunately, this is happening at a time when the options and quality available for educators and corporations to provide e-learning have never been so good. Cheap, simple, and quick options such as Moodle are available and free to all, and there are other good open-source as well as proprietary solutions.

Increased use of distance education will likely drive increased investment as well, which is great for learners. Institutions usually don’t see it, but the majority of the costs associated with e-learning are not technology provisioning costs, they’re instructional resource development costs.

And that’s good news for educators as well.

Turns out the mobile web is just … the web

Russell Beattie should stand up tall and proud. The Yahoo! alum gave up a secure job (well, sorta secure) and a steady paycheck to tread the uncertain waters of the startup life, and unfortunately was sucked down.

He developed Mowser, a mobile web browser for small-screen mobile devices (OK, that’s a fancy phrase for cell phones). Mowser made big fat web sites small and lean for tiny screens and narrow pipes. (Example: check out Sparkplug9 in all its Mowser glory.)

But then iPhone showed us that the future of the mobile web was … err … the web. Not some “baby internet,” in His Steveness’ words, but the real internet. In your pocket. On your phone. On your iPod. And those of us who had tried to scrunch the web down onto our 2″ screens jumped up and said Amen.

Here’s how Russell says it:

The argument up to now has been simply that there are roughly 3 billion phones out there, and that when these phones get on the Internet, their vast numbers will outweigh PCs and tilt the market towards mobile as the primary web device. The problem is that these billions of users *haven’t* gotten on the Internet, and they won’t until the experience is better and access to the web is barrier-free – and that means better devices and “full browsers”. Let’s face it, you really aren’t going to spend any real time or effort browsing the web on your mobile phone unless you’re using Opera Mini, or have a smart phone with a decent browser – as any other option is a waste of time, effort and money. Users recognize this, and have made it very clear they won’t be using the “Mobile Web” as a substitute for better browsers, rather they’ll just stay away completely.

I can’t agree more … as unfortunate as it is for someone who’s sunk his life savings into making the web work in miniature.

In any case, he’s now looking for a job.

Someone will benefit by having him on-board. Not only is he new media savvy, he’s just spent his life savings figuring out what doesn’t work. Some smart company is going to be the beneficiary of that hard-won wisdom as he starts building what does.

. . .
. . .

More analysis, insight, and general reportage:

ReadWriteWeb sort of agrees
Last 100 disagrees
Mobile Marketing Watch might want to buy Mowser
Another one hits the deadpool
Venture Chronicles thinks the mobile model is wrong
Larry Dignan at ZDNet mostly agrees

OpenMac: ugly but cheap

Please see the comment on this story from David Boone. This whole company appears to be a hoax – Gizmodo has the story.

PsyStar Corp‘s new OpenMac is a game changer for Mac switchers. It’s not pretty, and it’s not small. But it is very, very cheap.

Here’s the basic box. It’s available without any extras for $399.

And here’s the price … loaded up with a big hard drive, faster processor, 4 GB of RAM, a fast graphics card, and 3 FireWire ports:

I’m tempted to pick up one, but a couple of things hold me back.

First of all, I love Apple fit and finish. Aesthetics are important to me, and I don’t want objects in my house that I don’t love. Secondly, I’m fairly certain Apple’s next OS update will include some code checking if it’s on an OpenMac, and potentially brick your computer. (I’m also fairly certain that enterprising hackers will find a way around that, but I’m not the type that likes to do open heart surgery on my operating system.)

But I bet a lot of potential switchers will pick one up – primarily technical types who have wanted to check Apple out, but have not wanted to drop the grand or more that is the current price of admission (Mac Mini aside).

And the end results will actually be good for Apple with an expanded market, OS sales to anyone who antes up, and a cheap entry point to Mac that does not compromise the Apple brand.

Live-blogging: Hi-Tech Communication, Lo-Tech Principal

I’m liveblogging a NAESP session by Tod Harrison from Durant Intermediate School in Oklahoma. Should be interesting.

Problem: getting information home
Just not getting there … and not much budget to play with. Also, many parents not available during the day. But they needed to get information to parents.

His assistant principal is not tech-challenged … and neither is Tod. But if he tells that to teachers, he’ll be doing tech support all day long. So … they’re looking for solutions that don’t involve them doing it all themselves.

But, found out that 60% of parents have email (at library, work, school). So, they started a weekly email newsletter. No size limitations, and no paper wasted either. Teachers started a section: Teacher Brags, in which teachers brag about how well kids are doing.

Response
First week – hundreds of responses. Parents loved it. Interesting … his assistant created it in Word and converted to PDF to email. Don’t use an HTML email format or anything like that.

Evolving the idea
After starting, they then added podcasts, using a Mac server and Audacity for recording. Their podcasts are now publicaly available at Durant’s site.

They’re now using Macs with Garageband to capture podcasts. They’re doing enhanced podcasts with photos so that essentially you’ve got a presentation.

Now with kids
Now they’re getting the kids involved … 5th grade class did a video for presentation for the staff Building Leadership Team meeting. Took them about 20 minutes a day for 2 days, plus some editing time, I presume.

The kids know this … it’s simple for them, and teachers need to catch up.

Bumps along the path
There are some challenges they’re working through …

  • It’s technology … so there are still some bumps along the way.
  • Plus, it costs a decent amount of money.
  • Need to learn the programs
  • Takes time
  • Teachers have some technology fear

Interesting … I asked whether he’s had any pushback from parents who don’t have email. Not really, he said – he’s got 75 new email addresses in the last month. So more parents had email – or just got it – than he knew of originally.

. . .
. . .

Now we’re just all chatting in the room, and the principal (Steven Puckett from Indian Land Elementary School) sitting next to me mentioned they use ConnectEd, which can send messages in multiple formats to multiple groups of people automatically.

Live-blogging: LMS in Elementary?

I’m currently in a session at NAESP on using Blackboard, a Learning Management System, in elementary schools. This is interesting, because LMSs or CMSs (course management systems) are almost always only used for high school and higher education, and sometimes in middle school. But elementary is almost unprecedented.

Betsy Jones, an administrator in Greenville, SC, uses it for:

  • sharing info and resources
  • formative and summative assessment via surveys & tests in Blackboard
  • self-directed learning
  • collaborative learning experiences
  • 21st century skills
  • parent involvement
  • activities for early finishers
  • differentiation for different types of learners, and learners who learn at different speeds

She teaches a few students to use the system … then the students teach each other. Interesting! Then students start playing with what they’re seeing, and sharing what they’re learning.

Even more interesting, she had requested students with major discipline problems, and so filled her class with kids like that … and saw huge improvements in learning and behavior. Betsy attributes that almost entirely to student engagement.

She had one student who was a “problem” introduce Blackboard to the teachers … a huge bonus for him and also a major boost to teachers using technology – if this 5th grader could do it, they had to be able to do it. Teachers were scared to use tech … but the students helped them along. Betsy even had some students attend professional development for teachers when the school acquired SMART boards.

… currently getting an overview of Backboard functionality … fairly standard stuff.

A teacher in the group pipes up and talks about how she uses their LMS to post the weekly schedule every Friday night, and updates with announcements every morning.

I asked Betsy if she lets students use discussion boards. Some classes yes, some classes no. When she does, she gets parents trained at the beginning of the year with students, and they sign an “acceptable use form.” Has worked very well, even in a high-poverty area where only 2 of her students had computers at home. Some parents even started coming into school with their kids in order to use the computers and get on the class site. Very cool.

For spelling tests, she recorded words and then had kids listen to them, writing down what they thought the spelling was. She had 5th graders post notes from Math classes to Blackboard so that they could access it at home later when they were doing homework and needed to refresh their memories.

Overall, she felt there was much more student excitement and engagement … resulting in much improved student learning

Microsoft!

From Reuters via Information Week:

Yahoo (NSDQ: YHOO)’s second-biggest investor urged Microsoft (NSDQ: MSFT) to raise its $42 billion bid for the Web pioneer and warned Yahoo it has few options left, raising the pressure on them to seal a deal.

Isn’t it somewhat hard to argue both of those positions at the same time? Wouldn’t that almost be like talking out of both sides of your mouth?

You would think, huh …

First miss for Shelfari (and Amazon)

As you may have noticed, I’ve begun using Shelfari to catalog the books I’m reading.

After a couple of months, I’ve finally found a book that Shelfari doesn’t know about: At the Sharp End, which is Tim Cook’s novel about the Canadian contribution to WWI. Interestingly enough, neither does Amazon.

However, Indigo (a Canadian bookseller owned by Chapters) does, and here it is (volume one at any rate).

I’ve wondered before if Amazon and Shelfari are linked … particularly since Shelfari buy-the-book links are to Amazon. Amazon has invested in Shelfari … which is probably why Shelfari seems to be using the Amazon book database.

. . .
. . .

Interestingly, when I fed Shelfari’s import functionality this page, it came up with a different book by the same author: Clio’s Warriors.

Oddness abounds.

And in the darkness bind them?

Nicholas Carr picked up on a recent IBM super-super-supercomputer project call Kittyhawk, which he facetiously refers to as “one computer to rule them all.”

IBM has launched an ambitious initiative, called Project Kittyhawk, aimed at building “a global-scale shared computer capable of hosting the entire Internet as an application.” Forget Thomas Watson’s apocryphal remark that the world may need only five computers. Maybe it needs just one.

Wow. Talk about thinking big. I’m not sure I can imagine a computer with that kind of capacity.

Can you?

Better than free?

Kevin Kelly, former Wired editor, is writing a book online – the Technium.

One thing he wonders about is in a world with a giant copier machine (the internet) and in which therefore everything is essentially free, how do you generate value? In a recent article, he talks about “generatives” that make something better than free:

  1. Immediacy
  2. Personalization
  3. Interpretation
  4. Authenticity
  5. Accessibility
  6. Embodiment
  7. Patronage
  8. Findability

As I commented on his blog …

Great article.

It’s very interesting to take the 8 “generatives” as a model and put existing business through it … do they fit? do they still work? is there still profit to be made?

One thing:

I think we need to differentiate between truly free and virtually free. The “copy machine” operates because people like me buy internet access, people like you buy server space, companies like NetNation, my host, buy and offer rackspace, and companies like the telcos provision and rent lines.

Incremental cost of using them is nil or almost nil, but you and I support this invisible giant copy machine in a very real way.

Seth Godin has also picked up on this meme …

That's bullshit, man (or, observations at the exchange counter)

I’m taking a research methodology course for my master’s program in educational technology.

One of the requirements was to do a ethnographical study of some common setting. I chose the exchange counter at Future Shop, a major Canadian electronics retailer.

Ethnography is challenging!

I decided to go to Future Shop and observe the returns and exchanges counter. Here are my notes – hastily scrawled between visits by suspicious sales staff!

They’re punctuated by my hasty attempt at categorization while in the store … and are pretty raw, pretty much straight from my notebook.

1. Scene
Future Shop in Abbotsford. Big store, jammed with electronics, computers, media, appliances, etc.

Near the front entrance of the store there’s a long counter with several electronic cash registers on it. Service staff face the entrance; clients walk up to them. The cash register screens are visible by service staff only; not clients.

Clients enter a line at a sign. There’s a roped-off section suggesting where the line-up should be. When a cashier is free, people move forward.

Service staff have a fairly informal uniform – black shirt, tan pants, with a security ID tag around the neck. Clients are widely varied in dress from jogging pants to jeans to suits.

2. Bearded man
A bearded Caucasian 40-ish man steps up to the counter. He’s got a boxed product and a variety of papers – receipt, and some bigger sheet of paper. Phones are ringing. The PA system repeatedly pages various people in various departments. He talks to the cashier; there seems to be an impasse. He leaves with his papers and box.

3. Bald man
An 60-ish Caucasian man steps up to the counter. Strained expression on his face. Cashier (20-ish, female, short, dark-haired, Indo-Canadian) checks his receipt, checks his box, asks questions, taps data into her cash register. I hear him say “whatever.”

There’s little eye contact between him and the cashier. He has on hand on his hip, one hand on the counter.

She scans his credit card, seems to be finishing up. She cracks a joke, pointing at some place in the store. I don’t hear her words. He laughs.

She continues tapping on the cash register. She smiles again, saying another joke or anecdote. He smiles. The register spits out more paper for the client’s signature. He signs.

4. Self-assured man
My attention is captured by a self-assured Caucasian man in his early 30’s. Suit, tie, dress shoes. Goatee. Short, slim. Walks up to a 30-ish couple in the line-up with a Guitar Hero 3 box in hand. “That’s the wrong music game,” he says, loudly. “You should get _____” (can’t hear the name.) They smile, nod, answer shortly and quietly.

5. Finished
Meanwhile, the bald man finished, and is walking away.

6. 2 young guys
Two young Indo-Canadian guys in jogging suits and white runners step up to the counter. They say something. Cashier says something … I catch “buy something else.” They leave the counter, walk past me into the main section of the store. One says while passing “that’s bullshit, man.”

7. Self-assured man #2
The self-assured guy steps up to a recently opened position on the exchanges counter. He’s loud – I can hear him half-way across the store, although I can’t make out every word. He makes eye contact, unlike some others, and says confidently “I need to exchange _____ for _____” (couldn’t hear the names of the products).

8. 30-ish couple
Meanwhile, the 30-ish Caucasian couple step up to the other station. He puts the Guitar Hero 3 box on the counter, talks to the cashier. She opens the box, checks the product, and checks his receipt. I hear a few words she says: “what happened?” They seem to want to check if the guitar is still working.

The couple does not make much eye contact with the cashier. The stand slightly turned towards each other, talking very quietly.

The guitar inspection seems over – the cashier taps on her machine and and it produces a 3-foot long receipt. He signs it, and she hands over cash. Must have been an original cash transaction.

9. Self-assured man #3
He’s just finishing up with the cashier. Is still loud and somewhat perfunctory: “Thank you very much and have a good day.” He turns, walks away with his newly exchanged-for product, and walk out the door. The alarm sounds … he slows, half-turns, then continues walking out. No Future Shop employees do anything.

10. 2 young guys #2
The two young guys are back, with some small product in a plastic case. I hear the word “here” as they plunk it on the counter. One faces the cashier as she processes the exchange, the other faces his buddy. Both make little eye contact with the cashier.

The transaction is over quickly. They sign the receipt and walk out. The alarm goes off again – they continue walking out. No-one does anything.

11. Diffident woman
A Caucasian middle-aged woman sidles up to the counter, but stays a couple of feet away. After a minute or two, the cashier looks up, speaks, and the woman walks closer. They start talking.

12. End.
My time is up. I’ve been approached 4 or 5 times by Future Shop staff with slowly increasing levels of interest. Maybe they think I’m secret-shopping them, or work for a competitor. Time to pack up and get out.

. . .
. . .

This was very fun and very challenging.

I really felt a need for a video camera to capture information that could then be analyzed in depth later … I really felt I was missing so much detail that I wanted to capture.

Outrageous cost of text messages

There’s a reason why SMS is a hundred billion dollar industry … and it’s simply that phones companies are unbelievably greedy.

Note: the three examples cited are, respectively: from your internet service provider via high-speed modem, over standard text messaging systems, and snail mail via the United States Postal Service. All are assuming that data is transmitted digitally (in the case of the snail mail, the bits are written on paper.)

COSTS OF TRANSFERING 2,560 MP3s:

TCP/IP: $1
TCP/SMS: $61,356,851.20
USPS: $307,072.00 (Bits written out on paper)

So getting a SMS delivered is bit for bit 200x more expensive than getting a message hand delivered to your doorstep anywhere in the United States.

What exactly justifies making SMS messages sixty one million times more expensive than ISP data and 200x more expensive than TCP/USPS? How come technology, communication, and infrastructure is getting cheaper while the costs of SMS messages are increasing exponentially? My theory: SMS messages are transfered over air made of solid gold.

Full article here. Well worth the read!

(I originally saw this at Slashdot. As noted at Digg, here seems to be a technical issue with that page – if you don’t see the article at that link, try the home page. It should be the top story there for a while.)

Instructional video that's fun

Professional photog Martin Weiss talks about how video can do a great job of explaining something … like a new product, service, tool.

His link lead me to Funky Cloud, which has come out with the greatest little productivity app, LifeShaker:

lifeshaker

That is a great little movie – check it out. I loved it, and my middle school daughter loved it too.

One thing:
They need to make the video portable and give themselves a chance to go viral … I’d love to post the video here and let people see it. If people are interested, they’ll jump over the Lifeshaker site and get more info.

Mega Nano Hassle

Having an iPod Nano can be a lot more work than you bargained for.

I got a fatboy Nano for Christmas. It’s great, sleek, beautiful, tiny, and the wretched bleeding thing does not hold all my music.

Having never had this problem before (owning both a 20GB 4th generation and a 30GB 5th generation of what is nostalgically now referred to as an iPod classic) this is causing me some serious angst. (OK, I’m lying about the angst part. Actually it’s just minor irritation, bordering on mid-level annoyance.) But in the wee, wee hours of the morning they really don’t feel too terribly dissimilar.

It turns out there is no easy way to tell the black-box machina Apple calls iTunes to “sync-up-all-the-music-that-fits-on-my-ipod, selecting-by-albums, giving-me-new-stuff (or at least a random sampling of all my music) every-single-time-I-sync.

I don’t know about you, but I find that distinctly annoying.

After all, my time is too valuable to spend manually figuring out what kind of music I want to listen to for the next few days. After spending 30 minutes on the worthless local paper, channel-surfing for an hour or so, and some impressive-looking but sadly resultless procrastination on household chores, the last thing I want to do is to make the computer do what it ought to do for me. It resembles work entirely too closely.

So: Apple. Please create a setting in the iPod prefs that does the above-mentioned task.

I would really hate to draw the conclusion that you are simply making it tough for people to own low-capacity iPods and engaging in some stealthy marketing for upmarket 160 GB versions … particularly when you’re releasing 8GB iPhones that would not hold my music collection either. That would just be cynical.

After all, if the geeks at ArsTechnica can’t figure it out either (and no, none of the suggestions there possess either of the two desired virtues of humane computing: elegance and … actual functionality), how can a mere mortal figure it out?

Thanks!

Shout-out: advertiser thank-you

Just wanted to give a big shout-out and thank-you-very-much to my advertisers and supporters:

Thanks! You help pay the bills, and it’s much appreciated.

Future of media

Fred Wilson just posted on the future of media based on his kids’ usage and some financial/valuation data:

  • Newspapers and radio are down and trending out
  • TV series on DVD more valued than movies (better bang for the buck)
  • Gaming of all sorts on all platforms is huge. Key thing: doesn’t have to be super-awesome amazing … they’ll play silly but simple and fun games on Facebook.
  • Books are still big
  • Magazines still big
  • Internet is huge – by far the biggest. Especially social sites such as Facebook, but also the kids sites like Webkinz and Neopets (which my kids love as well).

He admits this is based on a sample of 3 kids living with both birth parents who are fairly affluent, which skews the results (many kids don’t have the resources to buy TV series on DVD, for instance).

But what the wealthy have one decade, every has next, right?

iPhone and greed

Ken Ollin is wondering if the biggest innovation in the iPhone is greed. At least, that’s the catchy title of his blog post.

What he’s really questioning is why the iPhone is a closed garden instead of an open software development ecosystem.

In response, of course, eager Mac users have responded with the usual flood of comments to anyone who questions Apple – mostly making good points about the software development kit that will be coming out in February or so.

But Ken’s post is still valuable, as I commented on his post:

A lot of people have made good points in the comments. The SDK, etc.

But … let’s not lose sight of the point (even if we are Mac fans – and I’m one too.)

The point is that the ecosystem is more important than an individual piece of software or hardware – and any individual company. This is the key insight that initially won Microsoft the operating system war, and losing this insight is what is costing Microsoft today.

The point for Apple: cultivate the ecosystem. The returns are huge multiples of what the closed garden generates. Apple is likely moving in this direction with the SDK.

But here’s why commentary like this is valuable: the ecosystem approach is not in Apple’s DNA. Apple *is* learning it, but true-blue Apple SOP is to go it alone.

An occasional reminder is a good thing for Apple – and a good thing for all of us who love Apple products and software and ethos.

A mash-up of me: my online identity in one place

I’ve finally, finally, finally invested some time and energy in this, my new blog … and it feels good.

The idea is that Sparkplug 9 is the focus of my digital life. It’s the hub connecting all the spokes of my online interactions.

  • Sites
    So the latest sites I’ve found useful and interesting are in Links, courtesy of delicious.

  • Photos
    Photos that I’ve considered good enough to upload to Flickr are in Photos.

  • Books
    The recent inhabitants of my bookshelf, nicely organized and maintained thanks to Shelfari, are in Books.

  • News updates
    Nonsense that reflects my momentary state of mind is in Ephemera, thanks to Twitter.

  • Videos
    Videos and little screenshot movies I’ve uploaded to YouTube stream into Videos.

And they all – plus anything that doesn’t quite fit into any of the above categories – make up my online footprint.

Overall I’m pretty happy with how it all fits. It’s all very web 2.0 to be able to link bits and pieces from many different sites. Ideally, YouTube would have a better way to stream your videos onto your site … I’m not sure that having them all appear in one video player is the best option. But overall: not bad.

The beauty of it all is that it’s so easy with WordPress, the blogging software I use. Most major web 2.0 companies supply WordPress plugins to add their functionality to your site. And if they don’t some enterprising and generous plugin writer has, and is sharing the fruits of his labor.

Online identity is a complex thing … we worry about who owns it, we look for different ways to analyze it, we want to control it, and we worry about who will find it.

As for me, I’m just going to worry about creating it. Or, more accurately, living it. I’ll let the chips fall where they may … since the only worse than having a negative online identity is having no digital footprint at all.

Slightly less negative on Facebook

What with the insane euphoria of the web 2.0 crowd having found something slightly less web 1.0ish than MySpace in the social networking space and the insane euphoria of the VC crowd having found a new poster child for massively inflated valuations, I’ve been trying to maintain sort of a cool distance from Facebook.

(While, naturally, having a profile that I hardly touch.)

But this morning an old buddy from school sent me a message. By old buddy from school, I don’t mean university or even high school. I’m talking elementary school.

Wow. I hadn’t even remembered his last name, but I had remembered Jaimie.

Reconnecting with someone you haven’t seen in maybe 20 years is pretty cool.

Amazon marketplace: sorry, your purchase has been sold

Yesterday I bought 27 books from Amazon – mostly from the marketplace. Why not? The book are almost new, and they’re easily half off or less.Today I got a notice that a book I bought via the marketplace was previously sold.amazonNo biggie – I just went back to Amazon, chose the next available seller for the book, and bought it again.Here’s the deal: when Amazon sends out that kind of email, they should include a link to re-purchase. That would probably increase their sales from people whose purchases are no longer available.And would make an already very usable store even more so.

Baffled. Utterly baffled.

How much did you pay the music industry for the record player you bought 30 years ago? What percentage of your 15-year-old tape deck’s cost went to the music companies? And how much did the RIAA get when you bought your new Bose speakers?A big fat zero, obviously.Which is why I’m so utterly baffled by comments like this:

Zucker also revealed his company had asked for a cut of iPod sales – though the company receives no dividend from sales of record or CD players.”Apple sold millions of dollars worth of hardware off the back of our content and made a lot of money,” he said. “They did not want to share in what they were making off the hardware or allow us to adjust pricing.”

Almost. Literally. Unbelievable.What can you expect, I guess, from an industry that sues its customers, cheats its stars, eats its young talent for lunch, and is generally a disgusting, manipulative, and corrupting influence on popular culture.What a zero.

Subscribe to my Substack