Tag - design

More San Antonio architecture

San Antonio has some wonderful architecture, as I’ve previously posted. Here’s another taste.

They seem to like adding funky little additions to existing buildings:

1-san-santonio-add-on.jpg

Another one. Perhaps they’re even built at the same time as the main building – but they sure add some flavor to the design.

2-san-santonio-add-on.jpg

Lots of pattern and similarity in this government building near the Tower of the Americas and the new courthouse. Not much differentiation, though.

3-san-santonio-pattern.jpg

A 15-20 metre high sculpture in downtown San Diego near the convention centre. Labeled Friendship or something like that. I took this shot from directly underneath it, in the middle of its two legs.

4-san-santonio-friendship.jpg

Smaller buildings have their own flavor. This one might be boring and staid under the covers, but has been wrapped in living beauty:

5-san-santonio-green.jpg

More designed than architected, this little cafe just jumps out of the background:

6-san-santonio-small.jpg

San Antonio knows how to present itself after dark better than most cities. Here’s one of the towers of the old courthouse, near the Riverwalk.

7--san-santonio-tower.jpg

Arguably the most beautiful of all San Antonio buildings at night – the 275-year-old San Fernando cathedral, just across from the old courthouse. Beautiful!

8--san-santonio-cathedral.jpg

Platonic forms

Dallas airport is the biggest I’ve ever been in. It’s 4 airports in one, joined by a shuttle train that takes you on perhaps a 15-minute circuit between them all.

The shuttle stations are very modern, very bright, very white, and very minimalist. Here’s a detail of one of them:

dallasairportshuttle1.jpg

This is web 2.0

OK, so the term web 2.0 sucks, for the exact same reason any other label sucks: it over-generalizes, freezes reality into a limited confine, and means different things to different people.

But if we’re going to have a term (and we do) and we’re going to define it (and we are), then this ought to be part of the definition.

Here is 37 Signals’ design philosophy in three pictures. If you don’t know which one is web 2.0, you don’t know web 2.0.

37signalsdesignphilosophy.jpg

Dragon bike

Saw this guy and his heavily customized motorcycle in downtown San Antonio today.

He rode all the way up from South America, and is collecting cash to take him and his bike all the way up to Alaska, and then to Europe.

Yes, that’s real flame – he presses a button and the dragon breathes fire!

dragon-bike.jpg

What is this building?

OK, three guesses: what is this building?

firstbaptistsanantonio.jpg

It’s not a factory.

It’s not a warehouse.

Not a school.

And no, not an office building either.

It’s a close-up look of the structures immediately above the back entrance of First Baptist Church of San Antonio, where I went to church this morning. It’s an immense conglomeration of buildings that goes back to 1864 or so, according to an usher that I spoke too.

One piece was added on by building right over a city street. That’s what this passageway used to be … this shot shows what used to be the exterior of Webb Hall:

firstbaptistsanantonio2.jpg

San Antonio architecture

Part of what makes a city a great city is its architecture.

You can have great architecture without a great city, but you can’t have a great city without great architecture.

When I travel, I love to experience the new place. And it becomes a special experience when the place has a style all it’s own. San Antonio’s style is heavily Southwestern, of course, and monolithic: stone.

Here are a couple of the sites and sights that caught my eye.

Two buildings for the price of one:

SAarchictecture1.jpg

Funky streets make for funky buildings. This one with a bit of traffic light thrown in for special effect:

SAarchitecture2.jpg

San Antonio loves its trees. These two are growing out of a restaurant right on the Riverwalk:

trees-in-wall.jpg

Kress appears to be some sort of department store or something like that, currently undergoing repairs:

SAarchitecture.jpg

Usability as ethnography

I just read Peter Merholz’s now-ancient post on getting out of the lab and into the real world when doing usability testing.

One example he cites:

What we did, however, was field research. We went into 12 homes, and saw how people currently managed their stuff. And, believe me, it’s messy and complex. One participant used: a church address book, a week-at-a-glance, a Palm-style PDA, a simple address-storing-PDA, and an Access database to manage this task. Had we brought her in to test our prototype, we could have found out all kinds of stuff about how she used this prototype in isolation and away from her tools. But we would have learned nothing about how this tool could possibly have integrated itself into his complex web.

Wow. This makes me sit up and pay attention.

I’ve done some testing in a usability lab. It was a powerful experience to see people using applications that you’ve built, and breaking them, and breaking them in entirely unexpected ways.

But I can see that leaving people in their natural environment would be far, far better.

(Interestingly, Peter’s talking about using Bolt Peters’ relatively new Ethnio app for doing the in situ testing. I had contacted Bolt Peters for a usability testing job, but we hadn’t been able to make the schedules work together, so I eventually went with a different firm.)

The closer you get to people in their own … errr … habitats, the better you can understand how and why they are doing what they’re doing. And, therefore, the better you can design your product/service to meet those need and actually fit in their lives.

. . .
. . .

Incidentally, Peter says he’s in Vancouver right now for a conference and visit, and to email him if any regular readers of his blog want to meet up. I can’t find your email address, Peter, but if you see the trackback I’m sending, consider this an offer to get together for a coffee or something. My email is accessible on my resume.

New tag cloud: powered by Zoomclouds

You may have noticed the snazzy new tag cloud adorning the right-hand side of this page.

(I’m trying to be trendy and web 2-ish, and possibly get acquired by Google or Yahoo for mad money.)

I noticed the Zoomclouds link at Guy Kawasaki’s blog – he just got a new tag cloud as well. I thought I’d give it a shot.

The good
First off, it’s dead simple. Give Zoomclouds your RSS feed, configure a few settings (or not), and paste some code into your source. Done. It’d be hard to make it simpler.

It’s also nicely configurable – and so I was able to get the colors to match up to my site colors very easily. (And if you know a little HTML and Javascript, you can customize it a little beyond the defaults.)

The not-so-good
It’s not a huge deal, but I don’t like the big Zoomclouds logo on my site. I’ll live with it to get the tag cloud, but I think that since you go to Zoomclouds’ site when you click a cloud item, and that Zoomclouds is putting Google Adwords on the results that you see there, that’s enough branding for them.

More importantly, the posts that feed the tag cloud only go back a few weeks in time. I’d like Zoomclouds to spider my site and present a tag cloud that reflects all the things I’ve written – not just the stuff since I added the cloud.

The kind of ugly
This is a mixed blessing/curse: tag selection. Zoomclouds is easy, so you don’t have to manually tag all your content. Excellent – I’m too lazy to go and tag all my previous 700 or so posts, even though I’d do it for stuff going forward.

However, this means that Zoomclouds makes a somewhat-arbitrary determination, based on parsing through your RSS feed, on what is a tag or not. This works, sometimes. Maybe even most of the time.

But it does mean that I have a tag on my site labeled poor bird. Umm … it’s unlikely I’d ever create a tag like that if I were doing it myself.

Hopefully, however, Zoomclouds incorporates some social intelligence into what should be a tag or not, based on all the sites using its service, and will get better over time.

(Looks like they’re working on this issue already.)

Suggestions

  1. Zoomclouds should understand categories, and automatically accept them as tags (at least for the major blogging platforms).
  2. Zoomclouds should allow for some form of manual tagging, if only as an option for geeks.
  3. A ping service would be wonderful, so that you could just add Zoomclouds to the list of pings your blogging software sends out automatically for each post. Knowing that you’ve added content recently, Zoomclouds could then refresh your tag cloud based on the update.
  4. A force update feature would be nice – something that you could click and force Zoomcloud to refresh its cache of your content and the tag cloud that it has created for you. (I’ve mentioned this one in a comment on Zoomcloud’s site.)
  5. And, as mentioned, it’d be great if Zoomclouds spidered my blog and made the cloud relevant for all my posts, not just the past few.

Overall
The results are good enough right now that I’ll stick with the service for a bit, and see how it goes. I like the look of the tag cloud, and I like that way of organizing and navigating information, and I’m hoping the service will improve over time in the areas where it might be a little wanting.

Luminous platforms and relaxed seating

A couple of days ago Teresa and I were at San Diego’s Museum of Art. James Hyde is showing his art/furniture there.

It’s a living presentation titled “Luminous platforms and relaxed seating” that, unlike most art, you can actually touch, sit on, and enjoy – as if it isn’t cool enough just to look at it. Wow.

james-hyde-luminous-table.jpg

Wouldn’t you love to have that in your living room, office, or library?

Superstructure and infrastructure in contemporary furniture design

Yesterday Teresa and I were strolling through Vancouver and happened to see a Roche-Bobois store.

Since we both love furniture and design, we went in (even though we had the kids with us). Fortunately the sales staff were friendly and helpful – not always the case in high-end furniture stores when you come in with kids.

I saw a piece that really got me thinking.

It was a side table system that incorporated at least 3 tables, all designed as insubstantial wood cubes that only had edges – no sides – and glass tops. All the tables fit together, and you could take one or more out as you wished. The result was a very complex visual image that would only work in a very simple room. But it could be stunning in that room.

Of course I forgot to take a picture, and the piece is not visible on Roche-Bobois’s website.

The image stayed with me, however, and as I was thinking about it today, I decided that the effect of the piece was to make infrastructure superstructure. This side table system, also from Roche-Bobois, does the same thing, although not to an equivalent degree:

PDT0154g.jpg

The infrastructure, or usually hidden parts that support the architecture of the furniture, is visible. That transforms the piece, making it all superstructure … all visible components of the table.

That contrasts with design that incorporates both infrastructure and superstructure, like this console:

PDT0019g.jpg

There are portions of the console – both structural and functional – that you cannot see. Hidden parts are infrastructure. Visible parts – the top and sides – are superstructure. Together, they form a single structure.

And that’s the key to yet another kind of design: where there is no distinction between superstructure and infrastructure. All you have is structure, and all structure is function.

An example is this wall shelving system, also from Roche-Bobois:

PDT0244g.jpg

Every plane is visible; every angle is structural; every surface is functional. There is only structure.

It’s the beauty of simplicity.

In pursuit of blogging simplicity …

As I mentioned recently, I’ve been looking for ways to simplify this site.

It’s a truism, but more is not always more.

And I was really starting to feel that more was less. So I’ve been getting rid of stuff:

  • time of posting
  • related posts
  • Google AdWords
  • Chitika MiniMalls
  • all the “add to Google,” “add to feedburner,” “add to My Yahoo,” etc. links
  • categories that stories are posted in
  • specific, labeled permalinks

And that’s just the beginning. What else can I lose … and in the process gain?

I’ll be looking for more!

Imagine: a phone that’s just a phone

I happened to see this Moto cell phone about a week back – probably a link off Digg or something like that.

moto-phone.jpg

Frankly, the simplicity appeals to me. The feature list is not as long as my arm:

• Built-in FM radio
• WAP 2.0 Browser
• Decent-sized color screen – 128×128 CSTN display
• Messaging services
• Lantern

I haven’t got a clue what lantern means, unless the phone can also be a flashlight. But the short list is in itself appealing. It’s not an MP3 player. It’s not a lousy camera. And it doesn’t want to manage my life.

All of which translates into better battery life and much simpler operation.

Cool!

Apple switch to Windows? Dvorak switch to reality!

John C. Dvorak, the one-time Apple journalist who has a history of incredibly inane predictions of doom and gloom for the company he used to cover, has completely outdone himself this time by predicting that Apple will drop Mac OS X completely in favor of Windows.

Dvorak still, pathetically, does not get it.

Apple is a hardware company, he says, citing the iPod as an example. Apple could still make its cool hardware, and just fit an “executive layer” over Windows to customize the UI.

I know it’s common wisdom that Apple is a hardware company, but as is so often the case, wisdom is not common, and what’s common is not wisdom.

Apple is an aesthetics company – Apple is a lifestyle company. In a digital age, how do you organize, manage, and accomplish everything you want and need to do? You need a digital solution.

And that is Apple’s niche.

Because the most successful solutions are the simplest solutions, Apple wants to control as much of the hardware and software as is necessary to ensure that the solutions it sells are as simple as they can possibly be.

Apple is Steve Jobs.

And Steve Jobs wants to create wickedly cool widgets that help more people get more things accomplished easier, faster, and more beautifully.

That’s why the iMac is one piece. That’s why the long-cherished one-button mouse. That’s why Apple’s Cinema Displays have been displayed at MOMA. That’s why iTunes and iPod go together, like two peas in a …

OK.

That’s the emotional, aesthetic, and passionate side of the argument. It’s also the side of the argument that’s based on who Steve Jobs is and what he really wants, needs, to accomplish.

Now here’s the business side of the argument:

How could any company be so incredibly stupid as to let another company completely control its own destiny? That’s exactly what would happen if Apple built an “executive layer” on top of Windows.

Assume that Apple took leave of its senses and did this. What if, the next month, Microsoft releases a patch that kills the Apple layer? Where would Apple’s customers be? Especially if it was a “top priority” security patch?

Dead in the water, that’s where.

Dvorak might want that kind of solution, but it would so tie Apple to Microsoft – and in a completely slavish way – that Apple would cease to exist as an independent, passionate, innovative company.

Crazy.

Blogs and white space: never the twain shall meet?

I’ve recently been considering re-doing my blog skin, and wondering about all the pieces, chunks, and components of a modern, integrated blog.

There’s a ton, at least on my site. At least 13:

  • header with “station identification:” name and so on
  • introduction to the site and author
  • list of categories
  • list of recent posts
  • RSS paraphernalia
  • archives
  • list of my recent del.icio.us bookmarks
  • credits
  • links, blogroll
  • Feedblitz email subscription
  • a footer link to previous posts
  • Google AdWords
  • Chitika Minimall

Oh, and by the way, there’s a bunch of posts, too. (Kind of the main reason for the site, huh?)

I’m looking at this and wondering: why have I added so much stuff? Isn’t this the opposite of simple? What are really the essential components?

Flickr blog
And somewhere today I saw a link to the Flickr blog. Whoa – whitespace galore.

The Flickr blog has about 4 elements:

  • – header and “station identification”
  • – intro to the Flickr blog
  • – RSS
  • – Archives
  • – some info about Flickr itself

That it. Nothing more. Not a footer. Not a recent articles listing. No ads. No links. No categories. Clean. Simple. Refreshing.

Now comes the hard part: what am I willing to part with?

. . .
. . .

(Note: My posts themselves also have a ton more information (clutter) than the Flickr blog. How much is neccessary? How much is worthwhile? How much could I increase the signal-to-noise ratio by simplifying? Tough questions!)

Back using del.icio.us; bookmarking still PAINFUL

OK, I’m back. Back using del.icio.us, I mean. I took about a 6-month hiatus.

Bookmarks suck. They especially suck if they’re just on one of my computers, but they even suck when they’re on the web. When they’re on del.icio.us.

Well, perhaps I should modify that. They don’t suck (at least not very hard) when they’re on del.icio.us. The point of maximal suckage is actually getting them onto del.icio.us. It sucks even more than typing del period icio period us five times in one post.

Unfortunately, how else are you going to track where you’ve been on the web and what has caught your eye? So I’m back to using del.icio.us after suffering 6 months of dweebish bookmarklessness. But it still sucks.

Here’s what I have to do when I find something I like (and think, foolishly, that I’ll want to see again):

1) click a button on my browser toolbar that takes me to my account on del.icio.us
2) ensure that in addition to the URL of the page I want to bookmark, the description is filled in. If the page doesn’t have a good title, it won’t be. Fill it in.
3) if I want to have a hope of finding it again later on, tag it with 3-5 tags that make sense, fit with whatever else I’ve tagged, and don’t unnecessarily duplicate previous tags (e.g. sometimes using “tag” and sometimes “tags” for exactly the same concept)
4) click Save
5) my browser refreshes back to the now-bookmarked page.

(Note: and this is saving a couple of steps by having the button on my toolbar. And assuming that I have the account on del.icio.us. And assuming I have the tech-savvy to know there’s a toolbar shortcut, and where it is, and how to get it, etc. etc. etc.)

post-to-delicious.jpg

This is painful! It takes at least 45 to 90 seconds, if the tags are immediately obvious, and plus it’s a disruption to what I’m focusing on, searching for, learning about, or reading.

However, there’s apparently nothing better available right now. At least as far as I can tell.

. . .
. . .

FYI … you can kind of watch my clickstream now, as I’m pulling in my latest 5 or so saved bookmarks into the right column way down there in the hinterlands of this blog under the archive links.

New washer and dryer odyssey …

For over a decade, Teresa and I (mostly Teresa) survived life dryer-less. That sounds shocking to a lot of people, but we just never bought a dryer.

When we were just starting out, we spent $800 on a Maytag washer, and there wasn’t any cash left over – or at least none that we really wanted to part with – for a dryer. Air-drying’s better anyways, we said.

And over the past few years, what was the point? We couldn’t get a matching one now, after all.

Well, finally Teresa got tired of hanging laundry to dry, and a couple of weeks ago we bought a Frigidaire front-loading washer-dryer set.

frigidair-washer-dryer.jpg

But getting the set and getting it set up were two different things.

Read More

Comma stupid phrases

What’s the “comma-stupid phrase” for your business? job? department?

Do you know what the “comma-stupid” phrase is for your product or service? In other words, do you know what is most meaningful for your users? Because whatever that word or phrase is (i.e. the part that comes before the “, stupid!”), it should be driving everything from product development to documentation to support and marketing.

The “comma-stupid” phrase popped into american culture in 1992, with the political message, “It’s the economy, stupid.”

To be really frighteningly nakedly honest, for at least half of the projects I’ve been involved in over the past decade, I didn’t have a bloody clue what the comma stupid phrase should have been.

Scary!

Commonalities in good web design

I’m currently thinking of redoing my blog design, and just started another, Fish Crackers.

And I want it to be usable and cool and web 2ish and wonderful and aesthetically impressive, of course.

Here’s a great start for seeing what kind of design is hot right now. But not just hot – also good. Even great.

Here are the key factors:

– Simple layout
– 3D effects, used sparingly
– Soft, neutral background colours
– Strong colour, used sparingly
– Cute icons, used sparingly
– Plenty of whitespace
– Nice big text

The first, I think, is one of the hardest.

Designing stereo equipment furniture: Hivemind inspiration

I haven’t been able to find great/proper/fitting furniture for my stereo equipment, so I’m wondering about building my own.

This has me inspired:

hivemind-tier.jpg

It’s by Manhattan design firm hiveminddesign. You can get a look at it here too if you aren’t up to the pain of navigating hivemind’s oh-so-cool-but-very-90’s all-Flash site.

The feet, which aren’t visible in this pic, are exactly the same as the pieces supporting the shelves, but flipped on the vertical axis.

It only comes in heights and widths that won’t work for me, and I believe it costs something like $7500 US, so using it as inspiration is my only option.

Tailrank – yes, it’s rank all right

While I was surfing Jeremy Zawodny’s blog I noticed that he visits Tailrank every day. It’s one of the top 5 or 6 blogosphere tracking/mapping/spotlighting tools.

I’ve been there a few times, and popped by today too, but … I can’t stand that interface.

It’s ugly busy crowded nasty unorganized anti-simple complicated jammed crammed undesigned BAD BAD BAD. It’s anti web 2.0, that’s what it is.

Yuck. I’ll stick with delicious (which is ugly but simple) and Digg (which is well organized, clean, and fairly nicely designed).

Design matters. White space matters. Simplicity matters.

[ update ]

memeorandum is horribly designed too. It just looks like a wall of text to me – somewhat reminiscent of the old days of web directories.

Fighting The Tyranny of Too Much: Radical Simplicity

There’s something interesting about most “web 2.0” services.

Most of them, like Basecamp and delicious are not about more options/features/capabilities. They’re actually about less. And that’s exactly why they’re successful.

I was reminded of that when I saw this article by Blackfriars (a branding firm) about Too Much Stuff™.

How much? Too much:

Need proof? Let’s just look at the statistics around that trip to the grocery store. In The Paradox Of Choice, sociology professor Barry Schwartz takes his readers on a trip to a small supermarket and finds that shoppers there must select from 285 varieties of cookies, 85 flavors and brands of juices, and 95 varieties of chips. They face 230 soup offerings, 120 different pasta sauces, 275 varieties of cereal, and 175 types of tea bags. Supermarkets today carry more than 30,000 items, and 20,000 new products are introduced each year — and almost all of them fail.

And yet this plethora of choice doesn’t make us any happier. In fact, exactly the opposite:

In one experiment, when researchers asked subjects to compare chocolate chip cookies from a jar of 10 cookies and a jar of two cookies, the subjects rated the cookie from the smaller jar better than the one from the larger jar. And the cookie wasn’t just better. It was rated more valuable, more desirable to eat in the future, and more attractive as a consumer item, despite the fact the cookies were identical. More choice made the subjects feel that their sample was less desirable.

The authors of the article go on to talk about radical simplicity being the solution. They’re approaching it from the perspective of marketers and brand managers.

I’m wondering about it from the point of view of my own life. The only problem? Simplicity is hard!

Astonishingly bad branding

Happened to drive beside a truck from CopySource today in Bellingham, WA.

The biggest thing on the truck was the name: CopySource. Immediately above that was the corporate slogan: “Imagination. Creation. Print Solutions.”

OK.

The first two parts of your slogan are “imagination” and “creation.” But your name is CopySource. CopySource.

Now I know we all want to have aspirational slogans that make us feel like we’re doing wonderful amazing things, as opposed to picking belly-lint or moving rocks or pumping gas. And that’s great.

But when your slogan and your name are moving in two different directions, you’ve got a problem. The company probably started out as just another a copy shop, and now it’s breaking out of that niche … just another example of how difficult growing beyond an established brand can be.

The same dichotomy is obvious in the company’s mission statement on their website (which, by the way, is on the first page of their website):

Copy Source is in business to bring imagination into print solutions. Our passion is to work with clients to enhance their professional image in the global neighbourhood by using our digital and offset printing, desktop publishing and IT solutions to help them realize their mission and accomplish their goals.

Notice that both in the slogan and the mission statement they’ve got the real business dead last.

I have to think that sometimes it’s a much better solution to break off a new business to enter a new market – or at least a new brand – and keep each brand that you’ve got both focused and authentic … two things that suffer when you try to bridge categories.

Why I think about these things when I just happen to see a truck driving beside me, I have no idea …

Subscribe to my Substack