Tag - movies

Survey shock: people don’t follow through

Saw this on an article about how HDTV is still too complicated and difficult for the average person:

In a fall 2004 study, her company found that about 10 percent of consumers planned to buy an HDTV in the following six months. In such a study, researchers would normally expect about 7 percent to actually make a purchase. Only about 3 percent did, she said.

The reason: people are overwhelmed by options, choices, resolutions, technologies, and hookups. Here’s the story.

This confirms a few things I’ve been thinking lately.

But the more interesting thing is this: the survey/reality quotient sound bit from Frank Magid Associates, a public opinion, research, and consulting outfit in NY, LA, London and, improbably, Marion, Iowa.

The stat sounds similar to what I’ve been told: about 70% of people who say they’ll buy something in a survey actually will. But the reality (in this case) sounds close to what I’ve actually experienced: 30%.

This is hugely important, of course, when you’re launching a new product and spend $30,000 on market research.

How do you interpret your results? Do you have to research the research? What multiplier do you put on the percentage of people who say they’ll buy your widget?

Tough questions.

Lowest is fiscally safe, but not necessarily smartest.

Apple home theatre: PLEASE!!!

There are a number of spoof and joking rumors running around the internet about Apple’s plans in home entertainment: plasma displays, or all-in-one HDTV, etc., etc..

Well, it may just be a spoof right now, but Steve, we NEED Apple to make home theatre systems.

I recently bought a Harmon Kardon AVR 240 for home stereo, primarily. It’s for upstairs. But downstairs, our “home-theatre-in-a-box,” which is a JVC XV-THA5, is currently giving up the ghost. Or, not giving it up.

It simultaneously refuses to read DVDs and refuses to eject them until it’s read them. The result is predictable … and, for a unit that’s both the receiver and the DVD player, not good. Not good at all.

So I’m wondering if we need a new mini home theatre system as well.

But getting into that market again is horrific. The acronyms! The wires! The connections! The protocols! It seems almost impossible to put together a simple system. Interfacing the TV, the VCR, DVD player, satellite box, receiver, and the 6 or 7 speakers is a nightmare.

Apple could do amazing things with this market.

For instance, why are there 15 different types of connections? Optical connections, coaxial, speaker wire (15 different types right here), component cables, you name it. In fact, why on earth does a DVD player have to have separate cables for left audio, right audio, and video? I mean, what earthly reason, besides “that’s the way we’ve always done it,” is there?

Give me one kind of cable to connect everything. Make it smart, so it knows when stuff is connected – or when a piece is missing. Give me one device which is a PVR, digital cable (or satellite) receiver, HDTV tuner, DVD player, and possibly VCR (for legacy use) all in one.

Let me connect it to my TV with one cable. And let me connect my speakers to it with one cable, or wirelessly.

Make sure it tunes itself. It should know where its speakers are (just like Bose solutions) and adjust volume between the channels automatically. Give me one power button for the whole set-up.

Stick an Apple logo on it, and watch it fly off shelves.

[ update Jan. 10 ]

This is interesting … Apple-branded HDTVs?.

Chronicles of Narnia: first movie

I watched The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe (Disney, IMDB) last night.

First impressions: really very good. Enjoyable, fun, and well done. The story was not destroyed in the making of the movie, and the movie pretty much is true to the Narnia of the book.

The actors who played the kids (Lucy, Edmond, Susan, and Peter) were probably one of the best parts of the movie for me. They were perfect – just the right kids, just the right acting. Very real, very authentic feeling.

I wasn’t crazy about Tilda Swinton, the actress who played the White Witch. OK, but not tremendously compelling. And I really couldn’t get Liam Neeson as the voice of Aslan. Sorry, too many other associations, and it just didn’t sound right.

Other than that, however, I really, really enjoyed this movie.

It’s long – almost 2 hours – but I never felt impatient. The story was neither rushed nor drawn out.

One thing: don’t go in expecting Lord of the Rings. It’s not a Tolkien world – it’s a much smaller cosmos – a more English countryside cosmos. This is not epic adventure with a world-spanning struggle against an ancient enemy. It’s a much more localized story and film. That said, it works. It’s the right size for the story.

But if you come in expecting LOTR, you may be disappointed. At the very least, you’ll have to adjust your expectations.

Very worth seeing – possibly even worth buying … though I’ll be much more tempted to buy it if Disney ends up making all 7 of the books into movies.

PS:

Don’t stop watching when the crdits roll … there’s one more scene to come!

Narnia hateful – or Polly Tornbee?

CS Lewis’ book The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe is being released as a movie.

It’s the first book in the Chronicles of Narnia, which are almost-explicitly Christian fables that represent the cosmic struggle between God and the Devil – and good and evil in every human heart – in childlike ways. But almost every adult can enjoy the books as well.

I haven’t seen the movie yet – though I intend to – but already the long knives are coming out. Polly Toynbee, a columnist with the UK paper The Guardian, says that Narnia represents everything that is most hateful about religion.

Interesting that a story about children discovering a hidden world, finding good and evil in it, and battling the evil to help save the good, is hateful. One would have thought that contemporary radical middle-eastern doctrines of hatred and murder and death for anyone who disagrees with you might be slightly more hateful than this, but obviously, one is wrong.

However, what Toynbee really hates is the notion that there is more to life than we see with our eyes. That there is a God to whom we are responsible. That He has created a standard of what is right and wrong. And that there are problems humans can’t fix. All these are Christian ideas … and Toynbee happens to be an atheist.

Most people, however, believe that sacrifice for others is a moral, good thing to do in certain circumstances. As the Bible itself says, “Greater love has no one than this, that he lay down his life for his friends.” But Toybee disagrees:

Of all the elements of Christianity, the most repugnant is the notion of the Christ who took our sins upon himself and sacrificed his body in agony to save our souls. Did we ask him to?

That general sentiment is nothing new, although expressed with particular vehemence. As the apostle Paul said already in the first century: “we preach Christ crucified: a stumbling block to Jews and foolishness to Gentiles.” (“Gentiles” in this context means non-Christians.)

Of course it’s foolishness to non-Christians: if you don’t believe in God, you can’t really (at least logically) believe in sin. And if you don’t believe in sin, you don’t require salvation. Not requiring salvation, you have nothing but a sort of amused, detached contempt for a Savior.

This string of logic, however, is fairly hard to maintain while a) being intellectually honest, and b) having any sort of understanding of the wretchedness and depravity of humanity throughout the centuries, and c) knowing the results of every attempt that people have made to “fix” ourselves.

Getting back to Toynbee’s actual comment: it is precisely because we did not ask Jesus to die for us that His gift is so great, so good, so amazing. But I don’t expect her to understand that in any real sense, unless she has a personal experience with the power of God.

One more thing in her review rankles:

… here in Narnia is the perfect Republican, muscular Christianity for America – that warped, distorted neo-fascist strain that thinks might is proof of right.

Christians and Christianity have never believed that might makes right. Quite the opposite, in fact.

Who fought slavery in the Western world? Christians. Which nations have women who are the least oppressed and most free? Nations that once had strong Christian roots. What nations have strong legal systems that protect the rights of the accused from parties, movements, and governments? Post-christian nations, for the most part. Who donates the most money to charities, which help those who are poor, provide for those who are needy, and generally promote the welfare of the most downtrodden people in the world? Christians (find some supporting stats here).

Who also takes the most flak from atheists, ‘intellectuals,’ politicians, social activists, and other post-modern worldlings? Christians.

But hey. We’re used to it – it’s been going on for 2000 years:

If the world hates you, know that it hated Me before it hated you.

If you belonged to the world, the world would treat you with affection and would love you as its own. But because you are no longer one with the world, but I have chosen you out of the world, the world hates you.

Remember that I told you, A servant is not superior to his master. If they persecuted Me, they will also persecute you; if they kept My word and obeyed My teachings, they will also keep and obey yours.

But they will inflict all this suffering on you because of My name and on My account, for they do not know or understand the One Who sent Me.

Revenge of the Sith

Just finished watching Revenge of the Sith.

I finally rented it, and yes, it was JUST AS STUPID as I thought it would be. Unbelievable. Is every single character told to “follow your feelings?” Mine change from minute to minute. Following them would be like following a butterfly. Small wonder that Anakin “follows his feelings” to death and destruction, though Lucas tries to soften our revulsion at his slaughter of the innocents by calling children the rather animalistic “younglings.”

Revenge of the Sith is a typical latter-day Star Wars movie: all plot, and as achingly, bottomlessly, awfully empty as the void of space. (Which, come to think of it, is not too dissimilar to the original Star Wars movies. But at least they had an awkward, artless, lovable campiness to them. And they had a real actor in Harrison Ford.)

How on earth could Ewan McGregor and Samuel L. Jackson and Christopher Lee ever have signed on to make this horrible, horrible picture?

I hate to be a pedant, but the space scenes are incredibly mindless. Never mind the noise in a vaccuum – that’s been done to death. How about kilometre-long ships battling it out dozens of metres from each other? (Remember, this is space, which the Hitchhiker’s Guide to the Galaxy has just reminded us, is big. Really big. Mind-bogglingly big.)

Of course, that doesn’t stop Padme and (stowaway) Obi-wan Kenobi from making it thousands of lightyears from the capital planet to where Anakin is exterminating dozens of other luckless sentients (remember, the rebel alliance is hiding out on the fringes of the galaxy, and capitals are usually at least vaguely central) in about the time it takes mere mortals to have a coffee break.

Characterization has never been an Lucas strong point, but he reaches record lows in Revenge of the Sith. 3 minutes of screen time and perhaps 30 minutes real-time after Anakin is protecting Senator Palpatine from incipient death on the basis of the argument “it’s not the Jedi way,” he’s murdering children – Jedi children. Not, in the understatement of the year, believable.

And while movies are not big on simple solutions to simple problems (where, after all, would Dr. Evil be without his “la-ser” equipped sharks to rid himself of troublesome British secret agents) it’s hard to imagine a society that can virtually rebuild a ravaged, chopped, charred human being into a prosthetics-equipped cyborg not being able to offer Padme a simple way to avoid dying in childbirth. After all, we have C-sections today, don’t we? You might think that Anakin, who wants to save her life, might think this is a preferable solution to selling his soul to the devil, killing all his friends, and betraying all he once believed in.

At least, that’s what I would think. Perhaps I’m naive.

Frankly, it’s just too hard to suspend your disbelief at this and other monstrous gaping cracks in the plot – the viewer is jolted out of the world of the movie … forcibly reminded that this could not possible be happening. It’s just too … dumb. And that is the kiss of death for a supposedly immersive work of art.

Ugh.

Well, at least I can say I’ve seen it now.

Scientology, TomKat, & the Big Lie

I wrote a few weeks ago about Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes, and have since been checking out Scientology a little bit.

Yikes.

This is a deadly, deadly organization that kills its members who want to leave and forces adherents to sign a contract that indicates that Scientology can do whatever it wants to you, at any time, without any recourse to family, friends, or other help if you leave, or try to leave:

If circumstances should ever arise in which government, medical or psychiatric officials or personnel or family members or friends attempt to compel or coerce or commit me for psychiatric evaluation, treatment or hospitalization, I fully desire and expect that the Church or Scientologists will intercede on my behalf to oppose such efforts and/or extricate me from that predicament so my spiritual needs may be addressed in accordance with the tenets of the Scientology religion.

In other words, they’ll take you back so that they can re-brainwash you.

If you think that’s all BS, you really need to listen to this interview with a 17-year Scientologist who broke away from the movement. Or read this article about what kind of organization Scientology is. (Also see a transcript of a CNN story by Anderson Cooper on Scientology).

The inevitable conclusion is that Scientology’s favorite front men, celebrities like Tom Cruise and John Travolta, are either brainwashed victims just like the other innocent low-level adherents of the cult, or they’re merchants of falsehood who ensnare others in the evil of Scientology.

Sin City

I found this interesting quote in a review of Sin City.

Both evolutionary psychologists and social conservatives say that marriage “civilizes� men; it channels male energy, aggression and drives in a constructive fashion. In the absence of this outlet, these traits express themselves in violence and conflict. History and social science bear this out to a large degree: the most dangerous thing a society can have is a large population of young, unmarried males.

Charlie & the Chocolate Factory: 2 Thumbs Down

I took my son Ethan to see Charlie and the Chocolate Factory tonight. What a disappointment!

The book is great. The book is fun. The book is funny. The movie just misses on so many different levels.

Why?

Well, the book is about Charlie. Remember that title? It’s Charlie and the Chocolate Factory. That’s part of the charm … we see the story through the eyes of a child. Not so the movie. The central character is very definitely Johnny Depp, I mean, Willie Wonka.

In the book, Wonka is a child in a man’s body. He does and says whatever he wants, whenever he wants. Therefore, he’s hilarious. In the movie, Wonka is a white Michael Jackson. Errr, perhaps there’s a better way of putting that. In any case, to put it plainly, he’s freaky. He’s weird. And not delightfully weird either. He’s freaky weird. Serial killer weird.

And the androgynous haircut, spiky heels, pasty face cream, and nasty lipstick really, really don’t help. Big thumbs down on Depp’s characterization of Wonka.

Finally, in the book the Oompa-Loompas are funny and charming. In the movie, they’re just really bad dancers. Now the book is a music video? Whatever.

In some sense, movies made of books should be judged on their own merits. They’re really separate artistic endeavors. On the other hand, they use source material – often well-loved source material – and try to bring it to the big screen. In this sense, they should be faithful to the spirit of the original.

And this version of Charlie and the Chocolate Factory just does not. Not at all.

The Ohio Theatre

Tonight I had the pleasure of watching the 1930s silent film Metropolis in Columbus’ old Ohio Theatre, built in 1928. The theatre is incredible – probably seats around 2000 or so, and is decorated to the nth degree inside.

ohio theatre

Perhaps 1000 were in attendance, all us having having paid the non-princely sum of $3.50 for the privilege. (Thieves, all of us.)

The Ohio Theatre is very rococo … detailed, rich, and elegant. This shows the upper balcony, where I was sitting, and part of the main floor seating. Apologies for the blurriness … it was fairly dark in there, and I had no tripod.

ohio theatre

This shot is from higher up in the balcony, and captures some of the wall relief a little better:

ohio theatre

One of the immense pleasures of going to see a ‘silent’ film is the organ accompaniment. The organ at Ohio Theatre is built into the walls and surrounds of the stage, and Clark Wilson played it tremendously during the three parts of the movie: the long prelude, the short intermezzo, and the fast and, well, furious, furioso.

ohio theatre

The film itself was intriguing as it blazed a trail for seminal pictures like Blade Runner in its dystopic vision of an industrial world. It was shot in Germany in 1928, and movies are still borrowing from its images. The 5th Element lifts a scene right out of this film, and many other past and recent science fiction movies owe something to this movie.

NOT, however, its sophomoric ending: the heart must be the mediator between the head and the hands. Exclamation mark, exclamation mark, in all caps, printed on the last frame of the movie. Ok, maybe I’ll take a Greek chorus instead, thanks very much.

And not the anti-Semitism that you can see lurking below the surface. Rotwang, the mad scientist who creates a robot that aides and abets a workers rebellion (that ends badly) gets blamed for everything. He is the only character who dies, and guess what: he happens to be a Jew (or an staunch Aryan with dark hair who really, really likes hanging Star of David motifs all over his creepy house).

It’s really kind of eery to see this movie today, knowing what happened in the 1940s, and realizing that this kind of imagery help pave the way for that kind of mass evil.

However, overall a wonderful evening – a step back in time. It’s interesting that a ‘silent’ movie seems to be a much more social experience than today’s movies, particularly in a theatre like this one. The live musical accompaniment, in this case organ, and the occasional applause, make it seem much more personal. It’s a shared experience in a way that few, if any, of today’s movies can provide.

I highly recomend it!

Aidan sliding down the stairs

I’ve had this movie on my Sony W1 for ages, at least 4 months or so … and I thought I’d let it out in the wild.

Aidan (who was a couple months shy of 2 when this was taken) loved to slide down the stairs on his tummy, with appropriate sound effects, of course.

Click the pic to open the movie in a new window and turn up your speakers. Note: the movie is 1.7 megabytes.

aidan sliding down the stairs

Launching Apple’s iFlicks in the Year of HD: a studio’s perspective

Steve says it’s the year of HD. Bill says it’s the year of HD. Cringely says it’s the year of iFlicks … the movie version of iTunes.

apple selling videos via iTunes

That got me thinking: if I’m a studio, and I’m approaching the capability of selling movies by download through an iTunes-like interface, what am I looking for?

Well, if I’m a smart studio VIPer, I know that hackers around the world will find ways around whatever encryption I put on my files.

So I need to give up the utopian vision of perfect encryption, security, and control. Never has existed, never will exist. But I realize that for my business model to survive and even thrive, I don’t need that. All I need is to make it less attractive to steal the content than to buy the content for the vast majority of those individuals that constitute my market.

How do I do that? With the 3 hards …

The first hard: hard to find
As a studio exec, I’d want any bootlegged videos to be hard to find. So I’d employ spiders that would search for any video content and correlate it with all the known titles in my library of content.

If I found any with the automated search, then I would have a low-level employee check it out. Once they’ve determined that there is, in fact, bootlegged video here, any competent and litigous studio exec would call out the legal dogs and through some weight around. In response, sites start taking movies down, or start switching IPs, addresses, etc.

Do this long enough and persistently enough, and you start to make stolen content hard to find.

The second hard: hard to use
Secondly, as a studio exec, I’d want to ensure the process by which people could use any videos that are out there, or any tools for making transferable files out of DVDs people have bought, as hard to use as possible.

This was built-in in the video industry … videos are big, bulky, analog things. Few people had dual-cassette VCRs. Copying from one to another was not simple, not quick, and a quite involved. But in the modern DVD era, anyone who has any relatively modern computing equipment has everything he or she needs to copy as many DVDs as wanted, as many times as they please.

So as a studio exec, I’d want to ensure that the DRM I embed in any movies that are sold online will be difficult enough to circumvent that any people using tools to disable it will be forced to go through multiple steps, or have to download and install obscure software, or otherwise find it hard to use.

The third hard: hard to justify
This is the most important hard, and the one where, as a smart studio exec, I’d spend the majority of my time.

Most people would rather do things the right way, would prefer to buy stuff from valid vendors, would prefer to be on the straight and narrow. But it needs to be easy to justify. So it needs to be dead easy, simple, and straightforward. And, importantly, the price needs to be right.

That’s why the iTunes music store has taken off – it’s secure, reliable, and not too expensive. And iFlicks would have to be the same way.

So if users could get what they want at a price that makes sense … and it ought to be less than the cost of most DVDs in the store right now, because middlemen, physical media, inventory, shipping, etc. etc. are cut out … then buying becomes a more attractive option than stealing.

– – –

At least, that’s what I would think if I was a studio exec.

Scary baby

I just saw a video of a baby that is seriously freaky. Both the video and the baby, that is.

Check out Pleix Films’ website and click on e-Baby.

Yikes. If this is the future I want a club and a sabre-tooth tiger skin.

[ ADDITION ]

Net Flag is also very cool. And remember those games you played as a kid – you had a chunky frisbee-shaped thing with color sections that lit up, and silly sounds. You had to remember the sequence it played and tap it back to keep going farther. Well, check out Simone.

Whoever did this site is VERY talented, and has far too much time on his hands.

Subscribe to my Substack