Tag - learning

Tools, technology, and magic: technology in education

I was thinking about technology the other day at a Learning Series Alliance conference put on by Intel in Las Vegas.

Teachers are at one time the biggest problem and the greatest asset for any transformation project in education. That’s simply because people are the biggest problem and greatest asset for any organizational change in any institution, and teachers are the biggest group of employees in most education systems.

When it comes to technology, teachers are all at varying levels of comfort and capability. The reality is, unfortunately, that many of the current teachers in North America and western Europe cut their teaching teeth on chalkboards, paper, and pencils … and technology (especially student laptop programs) takes that whole paradigm and flushes it viciously down the toilet. The pedagogy – science and art of teacher – needs to change when the kids get information and creation appliances. But most teachers haven’t been educated, trained, or raised in an information-intensive learning environment.

Which brings up tools, technology, and magic.

Tools are things we know, are familiar with, and don’t even think about. Think hammers, shovels, and pencils.

Technology is simply a conglomeration of all tools that were invented and popularized after we were kids. Think computers, flatscreens, and Tesla electric vehicles.

Magic is stuff that is so amazing we can’t even imagine fully understanding it and using it. Think particle accelerators, ion drives, and fusion generators.

See the similarities?

Scientist and author Arthur C. Clarke famously said that any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic. The problem in education is that too many teachers are in that phase.

Many people now view most technology – PCs, software, web apps – as simple tools. They are understandable, useful, and comfortable. That group, however, is dwarfed by the huge cohort that views that same set of of tools as technology: stuff invented since I was in high school that I use but that are not really, completely, and totally native to me. And, on the far side of the bell curve is a still large group – probably larger than the tool natives – who view this same basic set of technology tools as magic.

This is a key problem when introducing technology into schools.

Accelerating change in education to better use technology to enhance learning depends on at least two things:

One: critical mass
Moving a critical mass of teachers at least one step up this chain … so that the magic teachers are now tool technology teachers, and the technology teachers are tool users, and the tool users are expert engineers.

Two: pedagogy
Popularizing and standardizing the excellent knowledge, skills, and tactics that have already been developed for technology-rich education so that they are as standard and obvious to teachers and textbooks, chalk, and pencils have been for decades.

Intelligence in a Sea of Data: Teaching and Learning in the Google Generation

This is a 2700-word paper for ETEC 533, a course in my Master of Educational Technology program at UBC.

Excerpt:

But when just about anything anyone wants to know is a simple search away, what, specifically, constitutes education in the age of Google? And, is it enough to know about, without knowing how, or why?

This paper is inspired by Nicholas Carr’s widely read Is Google Making Us Stupid? That being the case, of course, I have absolutely no expectation that any of you will actually read the entire thing.

But you may wish to skim …

Read More

3 wonderful little words: I don't know

Some 3-word phrases are very hard to say. And I’m not talking about the agonizing decision about when to tell your boyfriend or girlfriend that it’s more than just a “like” situation.

“I don’t know” seem to be the hardest three words to say, as VC Josh Kopelman makes clear:

Why do people feel pressure to have an answer for every answer?

I don’t know …

The fact is, many insecure people are unwilling or unable to reveal ignorance. It takes a certain degree of self-assurance or confidence to be able to freely admit that you don’t know something. I think most of us have been in contact – perhaps very close contact – with men of a certain generation that could never say they were wrong, or never admit error, or ask for directions. I think this is a related issue.

The funny thing is that today, todays’ criteria for what makes someone smart is not so much what they can store in their brain, but what they can quickly find, integrate, and utilize. 21st century skills are much more about information access than information recall.

The fact is that with the world’s store of data increasingly ever more and more rapidly, you and I simply don’t have headspace for the vast majority of information that is being created. What’s more, we don’t want to have headspace for it. All we want to know is that the information is out there, somewhere, accessible if and when we need it.

Searching beats storing.

So there’s no point in not being honest enough to admit there’s things you don’t know. That’s not a negative. The negative is a false belief in your own limited knowledge. The negative is also a lack of ability (or inclination) to search out and use new information as it become relevant to the kinds of things you’re doing today and tomorrow.

Today, the smart person says “I don’t know. But I can learn!”

Subscribe to my Substack